MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1242362017

Chapter 1: Prologue: Before 1800

2013· article· en· W1242362017 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
James F. O'Gorman

Bibliographic record

VenueTransactions of the American Philosophical Society · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicArchitecture and Art History Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPaintingEmblemVisual artsArt historyFolioProtractorArtPavilionRulerQueen (butterfly)HistoryEngineeringEngineering drawing
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

EUROPEln 1772, Thomas-Germain-Joseph Duvivier of France depicted what is now the lost world of the architect in a painting housed at present in the Norton Simon Museum in Pasadena, California. Le table de l'architecte contains items, clearly used, that we associate with the work of the precomputer-aided designer of buildings and other structures, especially hand-crafted drawings and draftsman's needs, such as straightedge, ink, pens, reference books, and a pair of compasses placed front and center (Figure l.l).1 Duvivier was a pupil of Jean Baptiste Simeon Chardin, whose Les attributs de l'architecte of about 1725-30, now in the Art Museum at Princeton University, also shows drawings, books, a case of drafting instruments, rule, protractor, and a pair of dividers in the lower left corner.2 Although the young architect of today would probably not recognize such obsolete tools, these instruments, as these paintings attest, once commonly functioned as extensions of the architect's hand in the drafting rooms of the Western world.5 Among the implements shown, pairs of compasses or dividers, less often a scale, a porte-crayon, or a ruler traditionally identified the sitter as an architect, although not always, as we shall see.4Now we often think of the T-square as the emblem of the past draftsman-designer, but, although used much earlier,5 the T-square did not become commonly associated with the architect until the latter part of the nineteenth century. Previous images of European or British architects most often include one or more drafting tools to signify the sitter's profession. A visual survey of the hundreds of prints created from painted portraits of Western architects found in such important collections as those at the Canadian Centre for in Montreal or in the Lawrence Hall Fowler Collection of portrait prints of architects at the Baltimore Museum of Art, demonstrates that a pair of dividers, often held by the sitter, at times shown idle on the drafting table, most frequently appear as emblems of the architect's profession. From portraits such as that by Nicolaes van Helt Stockade of the seventeenth-century Dutchman Simon Bosboom, architect, mason, and author of a work on the five orders taken from Vicenzo Scamozzi's treatise, who seems about to impale himself with his pair of dividers (Figure 1.2); through Henry Hornbostel's use of a quick-setting compass with legs spread to form the letter A for Architecture on the exterior of his College of Fine Arts at Carnegie Mellon University in Pittsburgh (1912-13); to Spiro Kostof s The Architect, published in 1977 during the advent of the computer, for which the dust jacket, designed by Egon Lauterberg, shows a pair of isolated wing dividers, this drafting tool retained its power to represent the profession.6 Often added to the display of an instrument were depictions of reference books, as in John Francis Rigaud's portrait from before 1785 of the Englishman John Yenn now at the Royal Academy of Arts in London (Figure 1. 3). Yenn holds the requisite pair of dividers with its points down on a finished drawing. Just above his right hand, the one holding the dividers, are volumes on civil architecture by William Chambers, his mentor, surmounted by an open instrument case. Above that looms a sculpture of giant acanthus leaves.7 As we shall see, the combination of instruments and books became the default position for the iconography of some architects' portraits well into the nineteenth century.We must distinguish between compasses and dividers. The former have interchangeable legs that can hold pencils, pens, charcoal, or chalk used in making lines on paper or parchment; the latter have two pointed legs not used to draw lines but to measure (often) an existing drawing, as the important nineteenth-century English architect, Practical Builder, and influential teacher of stair building, Peter Nicholson, demonstrates in his portrait by William Derby by holding a pair of dividers to a ruler, not to a sheet of drafting paper. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.489
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransactions of the American Philosophical SocietySame topicArchitecture and Art History StudiesFrench-language works237,207