Through The Poet's Eye: The Travels of Zagajewski, Herbert, and Brodsky
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Bozena Shallcross: Through The Poet's Eye: The Travels of Zagajewski, Herbert, and Brodsky. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 2002. xix, 191 pp. Introduction. Afterword. Notes. Bibliography. Index. Illustrations. $27.95, cloth.Bozena Shallcross, a professor of Slavic languages and literatures at University of Chicago, launches her study of peregrinations of three East European poets and essayists with a quotation from poet Elizabeth Bishop (a noted traveler herself): Is it lack of imagination that makes us come to imagined places, not just stay at home? Could Pascal have been not entirely right about just sitting quietly in one's room? (p. vii) Thus is established a crucial link between travel-whether completely voluntary or compelled by outside forces such as war, revolution, or whims of regimes-and possibility of original insight and creative vision. Leaving bourgeois herd vacationers and day trippers aside, what do poets and writers who are forced to travel, that is, forced to abandon home, perhaps forever, encounter on voyage? How do journeys nourish creative or even visionary states? How is trope of travel-and expanded optic knowledge (p. 10) which it occasions-a differentiating factor in work? Shallcross suggests that travel-defined for reader as a dynamic interaction of sight and motion which privileges the eye over other senses (p, 14)-is an experience ideally suited to phenomenological exploration. But are poets not already masters of perception, visionaries able to detect sublime in minutiae of quotidian existence? The fact that, indeed, they are, is telegraphed by another epigraph, this time from Andre Gide: Le poete est celui qui regarde. It i s precisely this intersection of normally discrete planes of private or ritualistic museum/gallery spaces, proscribed (to an East European living under communism) public urban spaces of Western cities, and notion of travel-the poet's solitary passage through time and space-that interests Shallcross.Truly at home amongst seemingly disparate conceptual frameworks and genres, from visual arts and architecture discourses to theories of exile, and from modernist lyric poetry to postmodern quasi-autobiographical essay, Shallcross delineates ideational horizon of her study with seamless authority: originality of three authors' approach to travel writing, she says, is based on their creative interpretation of journey-which they experience in an intensely visual manner-as a metaphysical journey. Their views are sustained through creative capacity to transform mundane aspects of world they observed into a sublime vision (p. xvii, my emphasis). She shows us how poet's passage through spheres of public (the cityscape) towards private (the museum) and finally sacred work of art (paintings, frescos, interiors, sculpture) produces a sense of inner tension, a state of heightened receptivity that holds exceptional potential for generating epiphanic vision.As economy of her thesis demonstrates, Shallcross has performed something akin to a surgical procedure. Hers is a close, and in places radical, reading of epiphanic writings (both poetry and prose) by Zagajewski, Herbert, and Brodsky, texts that resulted from a confrontation with specific works of art during authors' various travels-some of which had been brought on by forced exile. Her methodobgy offers an innovative way of bridging academic disciplines, pulling literary critic away from domination of Logos and art historian away from strictly visual discourses.The book is organized into a critical introduction and seven chapters, of which two each are devoted to Adam Zagajewski and Joseph Brodsky and three to Zbigniew Herbert. For Zagajewski, Shallcross traces poet's travels to New York City and centers her discussion on his epiphanic confrontation, in Frick Collection, with Vermeer's canvas Girl Interrupted at her Music. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,008 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,004 | 0,006 |
| Communication savante | 0,006 | 0,009 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,014 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,008 | 0,004 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».