MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W12825816 · doi:10.1023/a:1023943405292

Through The Poet's Eye: The Travels of Zagajewski, Herbert, and Brodsky

2002· article· en· W12825816 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
George Zbigniew Gasyna

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Slavonic Papers · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCentral European Literary Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAsideTrope (literature)SublimeEpigraphGloryHistoryLiteratureArt historyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bozena Shallcross: Through The Poet's Eye: The Travels of Zagajewski, Herbert, and Brodsky. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 2002. xix, 191 pp. Introduction. Afterword. Notes. Bibliography. Index. Illustrations. $27.95, cloth.Bozena Shallcross, a professor of Slavic languages and literatures at University of Chicago, launches her study of peregrinations of three East European poets and essayists with a quotation from poet Elizabeth Bishop (a noted traveler herself): Is it lack of imagination that makes us come to imagined places, not just stay at home? Could Pascal have been not entirely right about just sitting quietly in one's room? (p. vii) Thus is established a crucial link between travel-whether completely voluntary or compelled by outside forces such as war, revolution, or whims of regimes-and possibility of original insight and creative vision. Leaving bourgeois herd vacationers and day trippers aside, what do poets and writers who are forced to travel, that is, forced to abandon home, perhaps forever, encounter on voyage? How do journeys nourish creative or even visionary states? How is trope of travel-and expanded optic knowledge (p. 10) which it occasions-a differentiating factor in work? Shallcross suggests that travel-defined for reader as a dynamic interaction of sight and motion which privileges the eye over other senses (p, 14)-is an experience ideally suited to phenomenological exploration. But are poets not already masters of perception, visionaries able to detect sublime in minutiae of quotidian existence? The fact that, indeed, they are, is telegraphed by another epigraph, this time from Andre Gide: Le poete est celui qui regarde. It i s precisely this intersection of normally discrete planes of private or ritualistic museum/gallery spaces, proscribed (to an East European living under communism) public urban spaces of Western cities, and notion of travel-the poet's solitary passage through time and space-that interests Shallcross.Truly at home amongst seemingly disparate conceptual frameworks and genres, from visual arts and architecture discourses to theories of exile, and from modernist lyric poetry to postmodern quasi-autobiographical essay, Shallcross delineates ideational horizon of her study with seamless authority: originality of three authors' approach to travel writing, she says, is based on their creative interpretation of journey-which they experience in an intensely visual manner-as a metaphysical journey. Their views are sustained through creative capacity to transform mundane aspects of world they observed into a sublime vision (p. xvii, my emphasis). She shows us how poet's passage through spheres of public (the cityscape) towards private (the museum) and finally sacred work of art (paintings, frescos, interiors, sculpture) produces a sense of inner tension, a state of heightened receptivity that holds exceptional potential for generating epiphanic vision.As economy of her thesis demonstrates, Shallcross has performed something akin to a surgical procedure. Hers is a close, and in places radical, reading of epiphanic writings (both poetry and prose) by Zagajewski, Herbert, and Brodsky, texts that resulted from a confrontation with specific works of art during authors' various travels-some of which had been brought on by forced exile. Her methodobgy offers an innovative way of bridging academic disciplines, pulling literary critic away from domination of Logos and art historian away from strictly visual discourses.The book is organized into a critical introduction and seven chapters, of which two each are devoted to Adam Zagajewski and Joseph Brodsky and three to Zbigniew Herbert. For Zagajewski, Shallcross traces poet's travels to New York City and centers her discussion on his epiphanic confrontation, in Frick Collection, with Vermeer's canvas Girl Interrupted at her Music. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.006
Scholarly communication0.0060.009
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0030.014
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Slavonic PapersSame topicCentral European Literary StudiesFrench-language works237,207