Representations of the return to "Mother" in Canadian and Australian settler-invader women's writing
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This thesis focuses on the representations of mothers in Australian and Canadian settler-invader women's writing. The thesis is primarily informed by post-colonial theory, but it intersects with feminist theorizations of mother/daughter relationships, and feminine language and writing. Mothers have particular currency in these post-colonial literatures because of the dependence and autonomy that characterizes mother-daughter relationships, but also because they can be read as metonymic of the mother/daughter relationship that exists between an Empire and its colonies, often reflected in imperialist rhetoric as Mother Country and daughter colony. Mothers are also metaphorical of the motherland of the Old World and the potential of the New World of the colony. The thesis begins by examining the roles of women, as daughters, wives and mothers within the colonial project, and then situates this debate within current Second World and settler-invader theory. The first two chapters deal with nineteenth-century writers: Australian, Ada Cambridge and Canadian, Susanna Moodie. The attention to nineteenth-century texts provides a historical grounding for the later discussion of twentieth-century women writers, and indicates how motherhood and maternity were perceived and represented in some early Australian and Canadian women's literature. Because the colonial project was heavily invested in the reproductive capacity of the settler woman in Australia and Canada, Victorian ideologies regarding mothers circulate in these two women's writing, although not without ambiguity. Focusing on these maternal roles opens questions about the female colonial setter-invader's relationship to the New land and its inhabitants, as well as how an investment in Victorian maternal ideologies manifests itself It also raises the issue of the female colonial settler-invader's negotiation of identity in the colony, and, because female identity formation is closely tied to the mother, feminist and post-colonial theories converge here. The thesis then moves on to explore the works of four twentieth-century writers, Olga Masters, Barbara Hanrahan, Audrey Thomas and Daphne Marlatt, in order to trace the legacy of nineteenth-century patterns regarding maternity, mothers and country established in Cambridge and Moodie. These four chapters show the increasing difficulty of settler-invader subject formation as the settler subject becomes increasingly distanced temporally from imperialism. These chapters also broaden the questions of representing maternal experience in language, and the ways in which the relationship between mothers and daughters is inflected by the imperial, colonial and post-colonial histories of Australia and Canada. The research establishes the importance of unpacking maternal imagery, discourse and symbology of Australian and Canadian settler-invader women's writings, as a means of displacing imperial binaries, and recovering women in/from imperial history.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,004 | 0,008 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,039 | 0,019 |
| Communication savante | 0,010 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,005 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».