MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W128624488 · doi:10.14264/106183

Representations of the return to "Mother" in Canadian and Australian settler-invader women's writing

2002· dissertation· en· W128624488 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
E. Veronica. Thompson

Bibliographic record

VenueThe University of Queensland · 2002
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsColonialismGender studiesDaughterIdeologyRhetoricHistoryNew WomanSociologyGenealogyPolitical scienceLawPolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This thesis focuses on the representations of mothers in Australian and Canadian settler-invader women's writing. The thesis is primarily informed by post-colonial theory, but it intersects with feminist theorizations of mother/daughter relationships, and feminine language and writing. Mothers have particular currency in these post-colonial literatures because of the dependence and autonomy that characterizes mother-daughter relationships, but also because they can be read as metonymic of the mother/daughter relationship that exists between an Empire and its colonies, often reflected in imperialist rhetoric as Mother Country and daughter colony. Mothers are also metaphorical of the motherland of the Old World and the potential of the New World of the colony. The thesis begins by examining the roles of women, as daughters, wives and mothers within the colonial project, and then situates this debate within current Second World and settler-invader theory. The first two chapters deal with nineteenth-century writers: Australian, Ada Cambridge and Canadian, Susanna Moodie. The attention to nineteenth-century texts provides a historical grounding for the later discussion of twentieth-century women writers, and indicates how motherhood and maternity were perceived and represented in some early Australian and Canadian women's literature. Because the colonial project was heavily invested in the reproductive capacity of the settler woman in Australia and Canada, Victorian ideologies regarding mothers circulate in these two women's writing, although not without ambiguity. Focusing on these maternal roles opens questions about the female colonial setter-invader's relationship to the New land and its inhabitants, as well as how an investment in Victorian maternal ideologies manifests itself It also raises the issue of the female colonial settler-invader's negotiation of identity in the colony, and, because female identity formation is closely tied to the mother, feminist and post-colonial theories converge here. The thesis then moves on to explore the works of four twentieth-century writers, Olga Masters, Barbara Hanrahan, Audrey Thomas and Daphne Marlatt, in order to trace the legacy of nineteenth-century patterns regarding maternity, mothers and country established in Cambridge and Moodie. These four chapters show the increasing difficulty of settler-invader subject formation as the settler subject becomes increasingly distanced temporally from imperialism. These chapters also broaden the questions of representing maternal experience in language, and the ways in which the relationship between mothers and daughters is inflected by the imperial, colonial and post-colonial histories of Australia and Canada. The research establishes the importance of unpacking maternal imagery, discourse and symbology of Australian and Canadian settler-invader women's writings, as a means of displacing imperial binaries, and recovering women in/from imperial history.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.089
Threshold uncertainty score0.572

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0390.019
Scholarly communication0.0100.002
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe University of Queensland→Same topicCanadian Identity and History→French-language works237,207→