Notice bibliographique
Résumé
T he question of the poet's relationship with society is one that lies at the heart of Claudel's 5th Ode, la Maison fermee. From the beginning to the end of the Ode the poet strives to find his place, define his role and fulfill his responsibility vis-a.-vis his fellow human beings. For the poet, society can be divided into two major categories: on the one hand there are those who reject both God and God's faithful people (the drama-loving public, the rationalists, the pillagers), and on the other hand, there are the actual or potential members of the Church who center (or will center) their lives upon God (the living faithful, the saints and the souls in Purgatory). The poet's relationship with the former (enemy) group is combative; he persistently resists and distances himself from them because they refuse to accept his spiritual word and try to dissuade him from producing it. With respect to the latter (friendly) group the poet has a three-fold mission or responsibility which revolves around the creation of relationships through the communication of a spiritual word which emanates from his own intimate connection with God: first he tries to draw each believer (or potential believer) into a rapport with God that parallels his own; second, he strives to create the community of Church, that is, an affiliation between those individuals who are personally and collectively cultivating an affinity with God; and finally, he endeavors to establish an intimate tie between himself and these members of the Church to whom he ministers. The Ode traces a dramatic evolution from a relationship of confusion and alienation between the poet and an enemy public to one of harmonious and mutually supporting communion orchestrated by the poet between himself, God and all living and deceased members of the Church.! The Ode opens with the angry voices of the poet's former public who, in a tirade directed towards the poet, announce a complete breakdown in their relationship with him. The poet was once, they explain, one of them, and he offered them a word that responded to their needs and desires; but he has since changed his ways and thereby sorely disap-
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».