Bibliographic record
Abstract
T he question of the poet's relationship with society is one that lies at the heart of Claudel's 5th Ode, la Maison fermee. From the beginning to the end of the Ode the poet strives to find his place, define his role and fulfill his responsibility vis-a.-vis his fellow human beings. For the poet, society can be divided into two major categories: on the one hand there are those who reject both God and God's faithful people (the drama-loving public, the rationalists, the pillagers), and on the other hand, there are the actual or potential members of the Church who center (or will center) their lives upon God (the living faithful, the saints and the souls in Purgatory). The poet's relationship with the former (enemy) group is combative; he persistently resists and distances himself from them because they refuse to accept his spiritual word and try to dissuade him from producing it. With respect to the latter (friendly) group the poet has a three-fold mission or responsibility which revolves around the creation of relationships through the communication of a spiritual word which emanates from his own intimate connection with God: first he tries to draw each believer (or potential believer) into a rapport with God that parallels his own; second, he strives to create the community of Church, that is, an affiliation between those individuals who are personally and collectively cultivating an affinity with God; and finally, he endeavors to establish an intimate tie between himself and these members of the Church to whom he ministers. The Ode traces a dramatic evolution from a relationship of confusion and alienation between the poet and an enemy public to one of harmonious and mutually supporting communion orchestrated by the poet between himself, God and all living and deceased members of the Church.! The Ode opens with the angry voices of the poet's former public who, in a tirade directed towards the poet, announce a complete breakdown in their relationship with him. The poet was once, they explain, one of them, and he offered them a word that responded to their needs and desires; but he has since changed his ways and thereby sorely disap-
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.021 | 0.013 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.013 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".