MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W147107066

Race, Neoliberalism, and "Welfare Reform" in Britain

2006· article· en· W147107066 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Tracy Fisher

Notice bibliographique

RevueSocial Justice A Journal of Crime Conflict & World Order · 2006
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueSocial Policy and Reform Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésRacismConvictLegislationNeoliberalism (international relations)SociologyCriminal justicePrisonCriminologyWelfare reformLawImmigrationPolitical scienceGender studiesWelfare
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Race, Intersectionality, and Neoliberalism AS OTHER SCHOLARS HAVE NOTED (SEE SCHUSTER AND SOLOMOS, 2004; WORLEY, 2005), New Labour's first term saw the introduction of several high-profile pieces of legislation: the Human Rights Act 1998, the Macpherson Report 1999, the Race Relations (Amendment) Act 2000, and Future of Multi-Ethnic (2000), more commonly known as the Parekh Report. Some saw the legislation as a positive step by New Labour to tackle racism. However, in recent years new forms of racism continue to morph into insidious guises and a number of overlapping phenomena continue to shape the national imaginary. Coinciding with the increasingly hostile construction of asylum-seekers and immigrants as criminal, Britain has intensified the policing of national borders; it has also increased patterns of targeted surveillance and continues to reproduce a climate of fear. Alongside this, New Labour's Anti-social Behaviour Order 1997 and Crime and Disorder Act 1998 (both passed during its first term in office) support the tough on crime, catch and convict rhetoric and a system that particularly affects people from ethnic minority (1) communities and communities of color, who are more likely to be caught up in the criminal justice system. With this in mind, Britain has witnessed a dramatic increase in incarceration rates that has disproportionately affected black women, women of color, and other racial-ethnic groups. The accompanying boom in prison construction is mirrored elsewhere as well, especially in and North America (Sudbury, 2002). Due to the uprisings in several northern British cities (e.g., Bradford, Burnely, Oldham, Leeds, and Stoke-on-Trent) during the summer of 2001, as well as the events of September 11 and the London bombings in July 2005, difference--especially around issues of race--is highlighted in Britain's state debates. Specifically, after September 11 and the London bombings, there has been an onslaught of attacks on British Muslims, Muslim communities, and the Islamic religion. Anti-Muslim prejudice is a current manifestation of racism in Britain. Moreover, earlier of assimilation, integration, and immigration continue to be invoked. Such discourses, which are couched in the language of culture, nationalism and citizenship, and ethnicity, are racialized and mark a distinction between us and them--Britishness and the other. Corresponding with the entrenchment of Fortress Europe in Britain, discourses on immigration are joined together with the rhetoric of crime and prevention in such a way that migrant populations are popularly viewed as being clandestine, 'illegal,' and therefore more prone to criminal behavior (Angel-Ajani, 2003: 435). In Britain, these overlapping phenomena intersect with the political, economic, ideological, and moral forces of neoliberalism. Under the guise of welfare reform, the logic of neoliberalism strongly embraces widespread privatization and individuality; it calls for cutbacks in social and public services; and it imposes increases in the cost of living. All the while, it reinforces racial-ethnic, gendered, and class inequalities. Within this context, many communities of color/ethnic minority communities try to survive. Path-breaking intersectional approaches by and about U.S. and Third World women of color (Crenshaw, 1995; see Alexander and Mohanty, 1997) have shed light on the ways in which race as an axis of inequality, difference, and power intersect with gender and other forms of inequality (i.e., class). These paradigms are useful in making sense of structural inequalities and in understanding the complex matrix of race, class, gender, and nation. Intersectional approaches, for example, are helpful in talking about the ways in which low-income women of color are differently positioned with respect to the state and are experiencing neoliberalism. This essay uses an intersectional approach to explore the impacts of the rise of neoliberalism on some poor and working-class women of color in Britain, as well as the role of the Southwark Black Women's Centre (SBWC) in alleviating their hardships. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,836
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,990

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,023
Tête enseignante GPT0,338
Écart entre enseignants0,315 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeThéorique ou conceptuel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations9
Publié2006
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueSocial Justice A Journal of Crime Conflict & World OrderMême sujetSocial Policy and Reform StudiesTravaux en français237 207