MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W147107066

Race, Neoliberalism, and "Welfare Reform" in Britain

2006· article· en· W147107066 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Tracy Fisher

Bibliographic record

VenueSocial Justice A Journal of Crime Conflict & World Order · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Policy and Reform Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRacismConvictLegislationNeoliberalism (international relations)SociologyCriminal justicePrisonCriminologyWelfare reformLawImmigrationPolitical scienceGender studiesWelfare
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Race, Intersectionality, and Neoliberalism AS OTHER SCHOLARS HAVE NOTED (SEE SCHUSTER AND SOLOMOS, 2004; WORLEY, 2005), New Labour's first term saw the introduction of several high-profile pieces of legislation: the Human Rights Act 1998, the Macpherson Report 1999, the Race Relations (Amendment) Act 2000, and Future of Multi-Ethnic (2000), more commonly known as the Parekh Report. Some saw the legislation as a positive step by New Labour to tackle racism. However, in recent years new forms of racism continue to morph into insidious guises and a number of overlapping phenomena continue to shape the national imaginary. Coinciding with the increasingly hostile construction of asylum-seekers and immigrants as criminal, Britain has intensified the policing of national borders; it has also increased patterns of targeted surveillance and continues to reproduce a climate of fear. Alongside this, New Labour's Anti-social Behaviour Order 1997 and Crime and Disorder Act 1998 (both passed during its first term in office) support the tough on crime, catch and convict rhetoric and a system that particularly affects people from ethnic minority (1) communities and communities of color, who are more likely to be caught up in the criminal justice system. With this in mind, Britain has witnessed a dramatic increase in incarceration rates that has disproportionately affected black women, women of color, and other racial-ethnic groups. The accompanying boom in prison construction is mirrored elsewhere as well, especially in and North America (Sudbury, 2002). Due to the uprisings in several northern British cities (e.g., Bradford, Burnely, Oldham, Leeds, and Stoke-on-Trent) during the summer of 2001, as well as the events of September 11 and the London bombings in July 2005, difference--especially around issues of race--is highlighted in Britain's state debates. Specifically, after September 11 and the London bombings, there has been an onslaught of attacks on British Muslims, Muslim communities, and the Islamic religion. Anti-Muslim prejudice is a current manifestation of racism in Britain. Moreover, earlier of assimilation, integration, and immigration continue to be invoked. Such discourses, which are couched in the language of culture, nationalism and citizenship, and ethnicity, are racialized and mark a distinction between us and them--Britishness and the other. Corresponding with the entrenchment of Fortress Europe in Britain, discourses on immigration are joined together with the rhetoric of crime and prevention in such a way that migrant populations are popularly viewed as being clandestine, 'illegal,' and therefore more prone to criminal behavior (Angel-Ajani, 2003: 435). In Britain, these overlapping phenomena intersect with the political, economic, ideological, and moral forces of neoliberalism. Under the guise of welfare reform, the logic of neoliberalism strongly embraces widespread privatization and individuality; it calls for cutbacks in social and public services; and it imposes increases in the cost of living. All the while, it reinforces racial-ethnic, gendered, and class inequalities. Within this context, many communities of color/ethnic minority communities try to survive. Path-breaking intersectional approaches by and about U.S. and Third World women of color (Crenshaw, 1995; see Alexander and Mohanty, 1997) have shed light on the ways in which race as an axis of inequality, difference, and power intersect with gender and other forms of inequality (i.e., class). These paradigms are useful in making sense of structural inequalities and in understanding the complex matrix of race, class, gender, and nation. Intersectional approaches, for example, are helpful in talking about the ways in which low-income women of color are differently positioned with respect to the state and are experiencing neoliberalism. This essay uses an intersectional approach to explore the impacts of the rise of neoliberalism on some poor and working-class women of color in Britain, as well as the role of the Southwark Black Women's Centre (SBWC) in alleviating their hardships. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.836
Threshold uncertainty score0.990

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.315 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSocial Justice A Journal of Crime Conflict & World OrderSame topicSocial Policy and Reform StudiesFrench-language works237,207