MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1482438775

A Tribute to Andrew W. McThenia, Jr.

2001· article· en· W1482438775 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Samuel W. Calhoun

Notice bibliographique

RevueWashington and Lee law review · 2001
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueLegal Education and Practice Innovations
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésTributeSurpriseSilenceHumilityLawConversationRevelationArt historyClassicsPhilosophySociologyHistoryTheologyAestheticsPolitical science
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

A Tribute to Andrew W. McThenia, Jr. This Tribute gives special thanks for the heart and mind of Andrew Wolfe McThenia, Jr., better known as Uncas, who after almost thirty-four years at Washington and Lee taught his last class on December 5, 2000. That morning, the rest of us on the faculty donned the loudest, most outlandish neckties we could find (although few could actually rival Uncas's own) and converged on Classroom E for the final ten minutes of Contracts. We wanted to surprise him, laugh with him, even serenade him, but more than anything show some true if imperfect sign of love for this remarkable, original friend, this man of many colors. Like the figure celebrated in the First Psalm, Uncas is tree/ planted by streams of water,/that yields its fruit in its season,land its leaf does not wither.1 Few who spent time in Tucker or Lewis Halls have left untouched by the humor and canniness of his understanding, the attentive tilt of his head, his fidelity to conversation when words seem necessary or to silence when keeping still can meet a different need. I think especially of his willingness to be a colleague - to leave manuscripts stuffed in the mailboxes of junior professors with scrawled requests for comments, or to pass along newly discovered books and talk about them at the end ofa day on a walk across the footbridge. I think of his capacity to transform a classroom with the revelation of sheer fact. His seminar, Lawyering for Social Change, a study of the search for justice in the coalfields, profoundly engaged the students, some of whom became the nucleus of the school's related clinical program. Most importantly, as the following essays so eloquently testify, this is a man who has challenged his time and place. To the minimalism and pragmatism of an age, he has posed large, unapologetic questions ask lawyers and judges to re-examine the story they think they are living.2 Seeing a legal structure bent on nothing so much as separating winners from losers, he has responded with the language of reconciliation and resurrection.3 Participating in civil resistance, he has kept a steady eye on the fact that in the context of salvation we are exactly like our neighbors, lost and in need.4 Read any of his work and you will be forced to reassess the honesty of your own. As he wrote, most radical form of social criticism of the world as we know it is reality.5 Yet somehow his honesty about the world has not precluded hope, a flinty, hard-won second sight, that comes with discovery and practice of vocation.6 Recall his account of William Stringfellow 's chosen role: to be companion with others along the way, to carry the message you are not alone, ' and to give them courage to live humanly amid the fallen powers.7 Stringfellow, perhaps; McThenia, definitely. Uncas has been the surest of companions, has shouldered the same message, and has helped many around him tofind the meaning of their own beliefs and the nature of their own vocations, as well as unsuspected reserves of resolve and joy. As he completes his time at W&L, we ponder the poetry and belief of this singular man. And its leaf does not wither. - Brian C. Murchison Professor of Law Thomas L. Shaffer* Uncas picked up a five-letter name when he was a boarding school student in Orange, Virginia. By now, it is the way his friends and colleagues, his students and his clients, his wife and his children and his neighbors, identify him. It works throughout the United States and in Canada. I would not be surprised to see it work in, say, the offices of the European Union in Salzburg or in the former Soviet Union. (It occurs to me this universal name for Andrew W. McThenia, Jr., a name his boarding-school classmates borrowed from James Fenimore Cooper, shares brevity with such two-syllable, five-letter names as Moses and Jesus. The comparison has some promise, but I desist in order not to embarrass my retiring friend. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,168
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,563

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,010
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0070,001
Communication savante0,0050,003
Science ouverte0,0010,003
Intégrité de la recherche0,0030,007
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,1680,126

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,053
Tête enseignante GPT0,395
Écart entre enseignants0,342 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2001
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueWashington and Lee law reviewMême sujetLegal Education and Practice InnovationsTravaux en français237 207