MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1482438775

A Tribute to Andrew W. McThenia, Jr.

2001· article· en· W1482438775 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Samuel W. Calhoun

Bibliographic record

VenueWashington and Lee law review · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLegal Education and Practice Innovations
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTributeSurpriseSilenceHumilityLawConversationRevelationArt historyClassicsPhilosophySociologyHistoryTheologyAestheticsPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A Tribute to Andrew W. McThenia, Jr. This Tribute gives special thanks for the heart and mind of Andrew Wolfe McThenia, Jr., better known as Uncas, who after almost thirty-four years at Washington and Lee taught his last class on December 5, 2000. That morning, the rest of us on the faculty donned the loudest, most outlandish neckties we could find (although few could actually rival Uncas's own) and converged on Classroom E for the final ten minutes of Contracts. We wanted to surprise him, laugh with him, even serenade him, but more than anything show some true if imperfect sign of love for this remarkable, original friend, this man of many colors. Like the figure celebrated in the First Psalm, Uncas is tree/ planted by streams of water,/that yields its fruit in its season,land its leaf does not wither.1 Few who spent time in Tucker or Lewis Halls have left untouched by the humor and canniness of his understanding, the attentive tilt of his head, his fidelity to conversation when words seem necessary or to silence when keeping still can meet a different need. I think especially of his willingness to be a colleague - to leave manuscripts stuffed in the mailboxes of junior professors with scrawled requests for comments, or to pass along newly discovered books and talk about them at the end ofa day on a walk across the footbridge. I think of his capacity to transform a classroom with the revelation of sheer fact. His seminar, Lawyering for Social Change, a study of the search for justice in the coalfields, profoundly engaged the students, some of whom became the nucleus of the school's related clinical program. Most importantly, as the following essays so eloquently testify, this is a man who has challenged his time and place. To the minimalism and pragmatism of an age, he has posed large, unapologetic questions ask lawyers and judges to re-examine the story they think they are living.2 Seeing a legal structure bent on nothing so much as separating winners from losers, he has responded with the language of reconciliation and resurrection.3 Participating in civil resistance, he has kept a steady eye on the fact that in the context of salvation we are exactly like our neighbors, lost and in need.4 Read any of his work and you will be forced to reassess the honesty of your own. As he wrote, most radical form of social criticism of the world as we know it is reality.5 Yet somehow his honesty about the world has not precluded hope, a flinty, hard-won second sight, that comes with discovery and practice of vocation.6 Recall his account of William Stringfellow 's chosen role: to be companion with others along the way, to carry the message you are not alone, ' and to give them courage to live humanly amid the fallen powers.7 Stringfellow, perhaps; McThenia, definitely. Uncas has been the surest of companions, has shouldered the same message, and has helped many around him tofind the meaning of their own beliefs and the nature of their own vocations, as well as unsuspected reserves of resolve and joy. As he completes his time at W&L, we ponder the poetry and belief of this singular man. And its leaf does not wither. - Brian C. Murchison Professor of Law Thomas L. Shaffer* Uncas picked up a five-letter name when he was a boarding school student in Orange, Virginia. By now, it is the way his friends and colleagues, his students and his clients, his wife and his children and his neighbors, identify him. It works throughout the United States and in Canada. I would not be surprised to see it work in, say, the offices of the European Union in Salzburg or in the former Soviet Union. (It occurs to me this universal name for Andrew W. McThenia, Jr., a name his boarding-school classmates borrowed from James Fenimore Cooper, shares brevity with such two-syllable, five-letter names as Moses and Jesus. The comparison has some promise, but I desist in order not to embarrass my retiring friend. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.168
Threshold uncertainty score0.563

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0030.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1680.126

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.395
Teacher spread0.342 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWashington and Lee law reviewSame topicLegal Education and Practice InnovationsFrench-language works237,207