MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1483118103 · doi:10.1093/pch/8.2.109a

Clinician's Corner

2003· article· en· W1483118103 sur OpenAlexaff
Victoria Davis

Notice bibliographique

RevuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2003
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueOphthalmology and Visual Health Research
Établissements canadiensSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicine

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

A 14-year-old girl was referred for assessment of heavy menses. Menses commenced at the age of 12 years and were unremarkable until the past six months when she noticed an increased amount and duration of bleeding. The menses were regular but had increased from four to seven days of bleeding and she was now using up to 10 pads/day for the first three days. She denied any sexual activity. Past medical history was unremarkable other than for asthma, and a family history could not be obtained because the patient was adopted. Review of systems was positive for fatigue but negative for change in weight, cold intolerance, shortness of breath, easy bruising or prolonged bleeding. On physical examination the patient was pale but in no distress. Vital signs were normal. General physical and external genital examination was normal, with no evidence of bruising. Laboratory investigation showed a hemoglobin concentration of 74 g/L (normal 120 to 153 g/L), mean corpuscular volume and mean corpuscular hemoglobin were both slightly below normal. The platelet count was 392×109/L (normal 150 to 400×109/L). The international normalized ratio (INR) was 0.91 (normal 0.90 to 1.10), and the activated partial thromboplastin time (PTT) was 26 (normal 25.0 to 35.0). Thyroid function tests were normal. The patient's symptoms were well controlled with oral contraceptives but further testing revealed the cause of the menorrhagia. Bleeding time was slightly prolonged at 10 min (normal 2 to 9 min). Factor VIII was normal, von Willebrand factor (vWf) antigen was 0.28 IU/mL (normal 0.50 to 1.50 IU/mL). The ristocetin cofactor (a measure of vWf activity) was 0.36 IU/mL (0.50 to 1.50 IU/mL). Based on these results a diagnosis of von Willebrand's disease (vWD) type I (vWf is quantitatively reduced but not absent) was made. Type 1 vWD accounts for about 85% of all cases of vWD and typically presents with epistaxis, bruising and menorrhagia. The patient was responsive to desmopressin acetate (DDAVP, Ferring, Toronto) with an increase in vWf to 0.85 IU/mL, and ristocetin cofactor to 0.9 IU/mL. Abnormal vaginal bleeding is a common problem encountered by physicians providing health care to adolescent girls. The dilemma is to distinguish those who need investigation for bleeding disorders from those who do not. A careful history with attention to the number of pads used per day and the degree to which they are soiled will determine the degree of bleeding. Six soaked pads per day for three or more days would be considered to be heavy. Dysfunctional uterine bleeding due to anovulation (irregular, prolonged cycles) is the most common reason for abnormal uterine bleeding in the adolescent. However, those who present at or close to menarche with heavy vaginal bleeding, especially if they present to the emergency department, are more likely to have a bleeding disorder. Among those admitted for acute menorrhagia to the Hospital for Sick Children, 20% had a primary coagulation disorder. The most common hematological diagnosis was idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura followed by von Willebrand disease. It is, of course, always important to exclude pregnancy as well as thyroid dysfunction. Mild bleeding disorders do not tend to present with the classical picture of easy bruising and epistaxis; however, menstruation may unmask these milder forms. If there is any question of a bleeding disorder, then further investigation is warranted because it is well recognized that older women presenting with menorrhagia, as a result of underlying mild bleeding disorders such as von Willebrand disease, are often underdiagnosed. The diagnosis of a bleeding disorder can be difficult because the screening tests, such as PTT and bleeding time, are often normal in von Willebrand disease type 1, therefore, a high index of suspicion based on history is needed. If the diagnosis of a bleeding disorder is made and the primary symptom is heavy vaginal bleeding, then medical management is the mainstay of therapy. Oral contraceptives (cyclic or continuous) and medroxyprogesterone acetate (Depo-Provera, Pharmacia, Mississauga) control menorrhagia in the majority of these patients without the need for additional therapy. Hematological agents that can be considered are DDAVP (nasal or oral) which induces the release of vWf from endothelial cells, or oral antifibrinolytic agents such as tranexamic acid or epsilon aminocaproic acid, which can be given during menstruation. The patient should be instructed to avoid medications with antiplatelet activity such as acetylsalicylic acid and to a lesser extent nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Rarely, gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogues or surgery are necessary as last resorts to preserve fertility. The prognosis for future reproduction for these young women is excellent if managed by a team approach in a hospital prepared to deliver pregnant women with bleeding disorders. Menorrhagia at or close to menarche is not uncommonly caused by von Willebrand disease (especially in adolescents presenting to the emergency department with this problem). The PTT and bleeding time can be elevated but are more often normal, and specific testing (vWf antigen and ristocetin cofactor) is required to make the diagnosis. If the primary symptom is vaginal bleeding, then oral contraceptives or Depo-Provera are the mainstays of therapy.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Éditorial · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,728
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,388

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,008
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0020,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,001
Communication savante0,0020,002
Science ouverte0,0020,003
Intégrité de la recherche0,0080,005
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,7280,638

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,114
Tête enseignante GPT0,484
Écart entre enseignants0,370 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreÉditorial

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations3
Publié2003
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentnon

Explorer davantage

Même revuePaediatrics & Child HealthMême sujetOphthalmology and Visual Health ResearchTravaux en français237 207