MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1483118103 · doi:10.1093/pch/8.2.109a

Clinician's Corner

2003· article· en· W1483118103 on OpenAlexaff
Victoria Davis

Bibliographic record

VenuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOphthalmology and Visual Health Research
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 14-year-old girl was referred for assessment of heavy menses. Menses commenced at the age of 12 years and were unremarkable until the past six months when she noticed an increased amount and duration of bleeding. The menses were regular but had increased from four to seven days of bleeding and she was now using up to 10 pads/day for the first three days. She denied any sexual activity. Past medical history was unremarkable other than for asthma, and a family history could not be obtained because the patient was adopted. Review of systems was positive for fatigue but negative for change in weight, cold intolerance, shortness of breath, easy bruising or prolonged bleeding. On physical examination the patient was pale but in no distress. Vital signs were normal. General physical and external genital examination was normal, with no evidence of bruising. Laboratory investigation showed a hemoglobin concentration of 74 g/L (normal 120 to 153 g/L), mean corpuscular volume and mean corpuscular hemoglobin were both slightly below normal. The platelet count was 392×109/L (normal 150 to 400×109/L). The international normalized ratio (INR) was 0.91 (normal 0.90 to 1.10), and the activated partial thromboplastin time (PTT) was 26 (normal 25.0 to 35.0). Thyroid function tests were normal. The patient's symptoms were well controlled with oral contraceptives but further testing revealed the cause of the menorrhagia. Bleeding time was slightly prolonged at 10 min (normal 2 to 9 min). Factor VIII was normal, von Willebrand factor (vWf) antigen was 0.28 IU/mL (normal 0.50 to 1.50 IU/mL). The ristocetin cofactor (a measure of vWf activity) was 0.36 IU/mL (0.50 to 1.50 IU/mL). Based on these results a diagnosis of von Willebrand's disease (vWD) type I (vWf is quantitatively reduced but not absent) was made. Type 1 vWD accounts for about 85% of all cases of vWD and typically presents with epistaxis, bruising and menorrhagia. The patient was responsive to desmopressin acetate (DDAVP, Ferring, Toronto) with an increase in vWf to 0.85 IU/mL, and ristocetin cofactor to 0.9 IU/mL. Abnormal vaginal bleeding is a common problem encountered by physicians providing health care to adolescent girls. The dilemma is to distinguish those who need investigation for bleeding disorders from those who do not. A careful history with attention to the number of pads used per day and the degree to which they are soiled will determine the degree of bleeding. Six soaked pads per day for three or more days would be considered to be heavy. Dysfunctional uterine bleeding due to anovulation (irregular, prolonged cycles) is the most common reason for abnormal uterine bleeding in the adolescent. However, those who present at or close to menarche with heavy vaginal bleeding, especially if they present to the emergency department, are more likely to have a bleeding disorder. Among those admitted for acute menorrhagia to the Hospital for Sick Children, 20% had a primary coagulation disorder. The most common hematological diagnosis was idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura followed by von Willebrand disease. It is, of course, always important to exclude pregnancy as well as thyroid dysfunction. Mild bleeding disorders do not tend to present with the classical picture of easy bruising and epistaxis; however, menstruation may unmask these milder forms. If there is any question of a bleeding disorder, then further investigation is warranted because it is well recognized that older women presenting with menorrhagia, as a result of underlying mild bleeding disorders such as von Willebrand disease, are often underdiagnosed. The diagnosis of a bleeding disorder can be difficult because the screening tests, such as PTT and bleeding time, are often normal in von Willebrand disease type 1, therefore, a high index of suspicion based on history is needed. If the diagnosis of a bleeding disorder is made and the primary symptom is heavy vaginal bleeding, then medical management is the mainstay of therapy. Oral contraceptives (cyclic or continuous) and medroxyprogesterone acetate (Depo-Provera, Pharmacia, Mississauga) control menorrhagia in the majority of these patients without the need for additional therapy. Hematological agents that can be considered are DDAVP (nasal or oral) which induces the release of vWf from endothelial cells, or oral antifibrinolytic agents such as tranexamic acid or epsilon aminocaproic acid, which can be given during menstruation. The patient should be instructed to avoid medications with antiplatelet activity such as acetylsalicylic acid and to a lesser extent nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Rarely, gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogues or surgery are necessary as last resorts to preserve fertility. The prognosis for future reproduction for these young women is excellent if managed by a team approach in a hospital prepared to deliver pregnant women with bleeding disorders. Menorrhagia at or close to menarche is not uncommonly caused by von Willebrand disease (especially in adolescents presenting to the emergency department with this problem). The PTT and bleeding time can be elevated but are more often normal, and specific testing (vWf antigen and ristocetin cofactor) is required to make the diagnosis. If the primary symptom is vaginal bleeding, then oral contraceptives or Depo-Provera are the mainstays of therapy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.728
Threshold uncertainty score0.388

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0080.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.7280.638

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.114
GPT teacher head0.484
Teacher spread0.370 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venuePaediatrics & Child HealthSame topicOphthalmology and Visual Health ResearchFrench-language works237,207