MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1488820416 · doi:10.1353/hms.2007.a383365

On the 2007 Clarendon Critical Edition of David Hume's A Treatise of Human Nature

2007· article· en· W1488820416 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
Peter S. Fosl

Notice bibliographique

RevueHume studies · 2007
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueHume's philosophy and hair distribution
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPhilosophyClassicsCritical editionEpistemologyTheologyHistory

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Hume Studies Volume 33, Number 2, November 2007, pp. 289-296 On the 2007 Clarendon Critical Edition of David Hume's A Treatise of Human Nature PETER S. FOSL I. Situating the Clarendon Critical Edition The Clarendon Edition of the Works of David Hume1 (hereafter the Clarendon Hume) was conceived thirty-four years ago in 1975, the year preceding the bicentennial of Hume's death. General editors of the Clarendon Hume are Tom L. Beauchamp, David Fate Norton, and M. A. Stewart. In Beauchamp's words, "Hume scholars had increasingly begun to appreciate that available editions of Hume's work were often textually and historically inaccurate, biased in favor of certain textual interpretations , and lacking in basic information essential for scholarly work on the text."2 The project of producing improved editions has since been realized by Stewart, Beauchamp, and the Nortons in the following manner. Beauchamp published in 1998 an Oxford Philosophical Text (hereafter "OPT") edition of Hume's second Enquiry—the Enquiry concerning the Principles of Morals (originally 1751)—together with Volume 4 of the Clarendon Hume, Beauchamp's Clarendon edition of that work. This new Clarendon EPM, of course, succeeds Selby-Bigge and Nidditch's 1975 Clarendon edition. Beauchamp's two editions of the EPM, like the two series of which they are a part, differ principally with regard to audience. The OPT editions—in their introductions, their annotations, and so on—are designed primarily to serve students, while the Clarendon editions Peter S. Fosl is Professor of Philosophy, Department of Philosophy, Transylvania University, 300 North Broadway, Lexington, KY 40508, USA. Website: www.peterfosl.us. E-mail: pfosl@ transy.edu. 290 PeterS.Fosl aim primarily to serve more advanced scholars. So, the Clarendon edition of the EPM, like Clarendon's other critical editions, includes elements proper to critical, but not to student editions. In addition to the critical texts themselves, then, the Clarendon critical editions include histories of each text, complete records of the emendations made by the editors, and accounts of variant readings, as well as a selection of copy texts used in the production of the new editions.3 In 1999, the year following the appearance of Beauchamp's editions of the EPM, his OPT edition of the Enquiry concerning Human Understanding (originally 1748), Hume's first Enquiry, was published. A short while later, in 2000, Clarendon released Beauchamp's critical edition of the EHU (which is numbered Volume 3 of the Clarendon Hume), offering a replacement for Clarendon's 1975 Selby-Bigge/ Nidditch edition. Beauchamp's Clarendon edition oÃ- A Dissertation on the Passions and The Natural History of Religion (originally 1757), Volume 5 in the new edition, was released with a 2007 copyright. Volumes 6 and 7 will comprise Hume's Essays, Moral, Political, and Literary, replacing in all likelihood Eugene Miller's Liberty Classics 1985 edition as the standard. Volume 8, when it appears, is to contain the Dialogues concerning Natural Religion (1779) together with other posthumous materials; it will almost certainly supplant as the scholarly benchmark Norman Kemp Smith's 1935 Clarendon publication. The year 2000 also saw the release of David and Mary Norton's OPT edition of A Treatise of Human Nature (1739-1740), four years after their David Hume Library.4 Like Beauchamp's OPT editions, the Nortons' 744-page volume begins with introductory material comprising 93 pages aimed at a target audience of students, with 179 pages of annotations following along similar lines. The Nortons ' OPT Treatise includes the Abstract of a Book lately Published, which Hume issued in 1740 as a pamphlet to promote his Treatise, as well as the "Appendix" Hume attached to the third Book of the Treatise. In 2007 the Nortons published what is the subject of this essay—the Clarendon critical edition of A Treatise of Human Nature, an edition that will supplant Selby-Bigge/Nidditch's 1978 Clarendon edition. What then characterizes this new edition of the Treatise, and what distinguishes it? II. The Contents of the Volumes The Clarendon edition of the Treatise is divided into two volumes. Volume 1 (447 pages) contains the critical text of the Treatise itself, as well as of the 1740 Abstract. The Clarendon edition...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: Théorique ou conceptuel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,306
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,605

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,070
Tête enseignante GPT0,433
Écart entre enseignants0,362 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeThéorique ou conceptuel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2007
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueHume studiesMême sujetHume's philosophy and hair distributionTravaux en français237 207