MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1488820416 · doi:10.1353/hms.2007.a383365

On the 2007 Clarendon Critical Edition of David Hume's A Treatise of Human Nature

2007· article· en· W1488820416 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Peter S. Fosl

Bibliographic record

VenueHume studies · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHume's philosophy and hair distribution
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophyClassicsCritical editionEpistemologyTheologyHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hume Studies Volume 33, Number 2, November 2007, pp. 289-296 On the 2007 Clarendon Critical Edition of David Hume's A Treatise of Human Nature PETER S. FOSL I. Situating the Clarendon Critical Edition The Clarendon Edition of the Works of David Hume1 (hereafter the Clarendon Hume) was conceived thirty-four years ago in 1975, the year preceding the bicentennial of Hume's death. General editors of the Clarendon Hume are Tom L. Beauchamp, David Fate Norton, and M. A. Stewart. In Beauchamp's words, "Hume scholars had increasingly begun to appreciate that available editions of Hume's work were often textually and historically inaccurate, biased in favor of certain textual interpretations , and lacking in basic information essential for scholarly work on the text."2 The project of producing improved editions has since been realized by Stewart, Beauchamp, and the Nortons in the following manner. Beauchamp published in 1998 an Oxford Philosophical Text (hereafter "OPT") edition of Hume's second Enquiry—the Enquiry concerning the Principles of Morals (originally 1751)—together with Volume 4 of the Clarendon Hume, Beauchamp's Clarendon edition of that work. This new Clarendon EPM, of course, succeeds Selby-Bigge and Nidditch's 1975 Clarendon edition. Beauchamp's two editions of the EPM, like the two series of which they are a part, differ principally with regard to audience. The OPT editions—in their introductions, their annotations, and so on—are designed primarily to serve students, while the Clarendon editions Peter S. Fosl is Professor of Philosophy, Department of Philosophy, Transylvania University, 300 North Broadway, Lexington, KY 40508, USA. Website: www.peterfosl.us. E-mail: pfosl@ transy.edu. 290 PeterS.Fosl aim primarily to serve more advanced scholars. So, the Clarendon edition of the EPM, like Clarendon's other critical editions, includes elements proper to critical, but not to student editions. In addition to the critical texts themselves, then, the Clarendon critical editions include histories of each text, complete records of the emendations made by the editors, and accounts of variant readings, as well as a selection of copy texts used in the production of the new editions.3 In 1999, the year following the appearance of Beauchamp's editions of the EPM, his OPT edition of the Enquiry concerning Human Understanding (originally 1748), Hume's first Enquiry, was published. A short while later, in 2000, Clarendon released Beauchamp's critical edition of the EHU (which is numbered Volume 3 of the Clarendon Hume), offering a replacement for Clarendon's 1975 Selby-Bigge/ Nidditch edition. Beauchamp's Clarendon edition oÃ- A Dissertation on the Passions and The Natural History of Religion (originally 1757), Volume 5 in the new edition, was released with a 2007 copyright. Volumes 6 and 7 will comprise Hume's Essays, Moral, Political, and Literary, replacing in all likelihood Eugene Miller's Liberty Classics 1985 edition as the standard. Volume 8, when it appears, is to contain the Dialogues concerning Natural Religion (1779) together with other posthumous materials; it will almost certainly supplant as the scholarly benchmark Norman Kemp Smith's 1935 Clarendon publication. The year 2000 also saw the release of David and Mary Norton's OPT edition of A Treatise of Human Nature (1739-1740), four years after their David Hume Library.4 Like Beauchamp's OPT editions, the Nortons' 744-page volume begins with introductory material comprising 93 pages aimed at a target audience of students, with 179 pages of annotations following along similar lines. The Nortons ' OPT Treatise includes the Abstract of a Book lately Published, which Hume issued in 1740 as a pamphlet to promote his Treatise, as well as the "Appendix" Hume attached to the third Book of the Treatise. In 2007 the Nortons published what is the subject of this essay—the Clarendon critical edition of A Treatise of Human Nature, an edition that will supplant Selby-Bigge/Nidditch's 1978 Clarendon edition. What then characterizes this new edition of the Treatise, and what distinguishes it? II. The Contents of the Volumes The Clarendon edition of the Treatise is divided into two volumes. Volume 1 (447 pages) contains the critical text of the Treatise itself, as well as of the 1740 Abstract. The Clarendon edition...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.306
Threshold uncertainty score0.605

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.433
Teacher spread0.362 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHume studiesSame topicHume's philosophy and hair distributionFrench-language works237,207