Surgical images: soft tissue. Transverse colonic intussusception.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
A 75-year-old man who underwent an emergent repair of a leaking inflammatory aortic aneurysm 2 years previously was seen in routine follow-up by a vascular surgeon in our hospital. At this visit, he was found to have a palpable nonpulsatile abdominal mass. He described a recent history of vague abdominal symptoms but no prior evidence of gastrointestinal bleeding. He reported no fever, chills or night sweats. Laboratory investigations demonstrated a mild anemia. An abdominal CT scan revealed a large mass within the lumen of his transverse colon and changes highly suspicious for an intussusception, with the mass as the leading edge (Fig. 1). He was referred to our service for surgical assessment, at which time, we elected to perform a semi-urgent colonoscopy. At colonoscopy, the intussusception was visualized (Fig. 2), as was a large tumour acting as a lead point. We did not attempt colonoscopic reduction of the intussusception. FIG. 1. CT scan of the abdomen. The arrow shows a lobulated mass in the region of the transverse colon and associated intussusception of the hepatic flexure. FIG. 2. Photograph taken at colonoscopy showing a proximal segment of colon telescoping into the lumen of the adjacent distal segment. The arrow shows the site of intussusception. We made a diagnosis of intussusception of the transverse colon secondary to a tumorous lead point. The patient was admitted to hospital and underwent urgent laparotomy. Upon entering the abdomen, a large mass was palpable through the transverse colon. The mass comprised an intussusceptum of both transverse and ascending colon, which was seen while telescoping into the lumen of the adjacent bowel (Fig. 3). Manual reduction of the intussusception was unsuccessful. There was no evidence of liver metastasis. An extended right hemicolectomy with side-to-side primary anatamosis was performed. FIG. 3. An in situ view of the patient's intussusception. The examiner's right index finger is seen between the overlapping layers of bowel. Gross examination of the resected specimen revealed the intussusception (Fig. 4) and a lobular fungating mass (Fig. 5) measuring 12.0 × 9.0 × 7.0 cm originating from the transverse colon. Histological examination identified moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma invading all layers of the bowel wall and neighbouring adipose tissue. Resection margins were clear of tumour. All 23 lymph nodes in the surgical specimen were negative for malignancy. FIG. 4. Resected and unreduced bowel dissected to expose an intralumenal view of the intussusception (arrow). FIG. 5. Reduction of the intussusception and dissection of the bowel showing the colonic adenocarcinoma. The patient underwent an uncomplicated postoperative course and was discharged home well. He was subsequently seen at the London Regional Cancer Centre regarding the use of adjuvant chemotherapy but opted against further treatment at that time. Intussusception, the most common cause of intestinal obstruction in infants aged 6–18 months, is rare in adults. Only 5% of all cases of intussusception occur in adults, and intussusception is implicated in no more than 1% of patients with intestinal obstruction.1 In the adult population, most cases are secondary to a lesion of pathological origin. Malignant neoplasms act as a lead point in approximately 50% of cases of adult intussusception. Adults with intussusception may report atypical or nonspecific signs and symptoms of bowel obstruction that make preoperative diagnosis difficult. In cases where the clinical picture is unclear, ultrasonography and CT examination have improved our diagnostic ability.1–3 Both diagnostic modalities describe early intussusception as a target-shaped mass, with the intussusceptum encircled by the edematous intussuscipiens. As the bowel thickens and becomes necrotic to produce severe obstruction, the intussuscepted mass becomes more unstructured.1,2 Controversy still surrounds the current management of the condition in adults and relates to the issue of reduction versus resection. The literature would agree that, once the diagnosis of colonic intussusception is made, surgical excision is the definitive treatment, given the likelihood of malignant etiology.1–3
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».