MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W148967975

Surgical images: soft tissue. Transverse colonic intussusception.

2007· article· en· W148967975 on OpenAlexaff
Jason D. Correia, Kevin R. Lefebvre, Daryl Gray

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGastrointestinal disorders and treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineTransverse colonColonoscopyAbdomenLumen (anatomy)Intussusception (medical disorder)LaparotomyRadiologySurgeryColorectal cancerInternal medicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 75-year-old man who underwent an emergent repair of a leaking inflammatory aortic aneurysm 2 years previously was seen in routine follow-up by a vascular surgeon in our hospital. At this visit, he was found to have a palpable nonpulsatile abdominal mass. He described a recent history of vague abdominal symptoms but no prior evidence of gastrointestinal bleeding. He reported no fever, chills or night sweats. Laboratory investigations demonstrated a mild anemia. An abdominal CT scan revealed a large mass within the lumen of his transverse colon and changes highly suspicious for an intussusception, with the mass as the leading edge (Fig. 1). He was referred to our service for surgical assessment, at which time, we elected to perform a semi-urgent colonoscopy. At colonoscopy, the intussusception was visualized (Fig. 2), as was a large tumour acting as a lead point. We did not attempt colonoscopic reduction of the intussusception. FIG. 1. CT scan of the abdomen. The arrow shows a lobulated mass in the region of the transverse colon and associated intussusception of the hepatic flexure. FIG. 2. Photograph taken at colonoscopy showing a proximal segment of colon telescoping into the lumen of the adjacent distal segment. The arrow shows the site of intussusception. We made a diagnosis of intussusception of the transverse colon secondary to a tumorous lead point. The patient was admitted to hospital and underwent urgent laparotomy. Upon entering the abdomen, a large mass was palpable through the transverse colon. The mass comprised an intussusceptum of both transverse and ascending colon, which was seen while telescoping into the lumen of the adjacent bowel (Fig. 3). Manual reduction of the intussusception was unsuccessful. There was no evidence of liver metastasis. An extended right hemicolectomy with side-to-side primary anatamosis was performed. FIG. 3. An in situ view of the patient's intussusception. The examiner's right index finger is seen between the overlapping layers of bowel. Gross examination of the resected specimen revealed the intussusception (Fig. 4) and a lobular fungating mass (Fig. 5) measuring 12.0 × 9.0 × 7.0 cm originating from the transverse colon. Histological examination identified moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma invading all layers of the bowel wall and neighbouring adipose tissue. Resection margins were clear of tumour. All 23 lymph nodes in the surgical specimen were negative for malignancy. FIG. 4. Resected and unreduced bowel dissected to expose an intralumenal view of the intussusception (arrow). FIG. 5. Reduction of the intussusception and dissection of the bowel showing the colonic adenocarcinoma. The patient underwent an uncomplicated postoperative course and was discharged home well. He was subsequently seen at the London Regional Cancer Centre regarding the use of adjuvant chemotherapy but opted against further treatment at that time. Intussusception, the most common cause of intestinal obstruction in infants aged 6–18 months, is rare in adults. Only 5% of all cases of intussusception occur in adults, and intussusception is implicated in no more than 1% of patients with intestinal obstruction.1 In the adult population, most cases are secondary to a lesion of pathological origin. Malignant neoplasms act as a lead point in approximately 50% of cases of adult intussusception. Adults with intussusception may report atypical or nonspecific signs and symptoms of bowel obstruction that make preoperative diagnosis difficult. In cases where the clinical picture is unclear, ultrasonography and CT examination have improved our diagnostic ability.1–3 Both diagnostic modalities describe early intussusception as a target-shaped mass, with the intussusceptum encircled by the edematous intussuscipiens. As the bowel thickens and becomes necrotic to produce severe obstruction, the intussuscepted mass becomes more unstructured.1,2 Controversy still surrounds the current management of the condition in adults and relates to the issue of reduction versus resection. The literature would agree that, once the diagnosis of colonic intussusception is made, surgical excision is the definitive treatment, given the likelihood of malignant etiology.1–3

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.731
Threshold uncertainty score0.410

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMedSame topicGastrointestinal disorders and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207