Dissolving the Reader/Author Binary: Sylvia Molloy's Certificate of Absence , Helena Parente Cunha's Woman Between Mirrors , and Jeanette Winterson's Written on the Body
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
In Western culture, we have been trained in binary thought: good or evil, white or black, logical or emotional, male or female. One of the consequences of such thought processes is associative, wherein the individual equates all of the terms on one side of the equation: good, white, logical, male or evil, black, emotional, female. Such conclusions have created serious problems for women and people of color, namely the association of evil with being or with being a person of color. One response to binary constructions is to redefine the associations of terms, such that is good or black is good. This, however, does not change the inherent bias of the binary construction. A more radical approach is to challenge binary logic itself, to argue, for example, that such definition is not absolute or even particularly valid. Sylvia Molloy (1938-), Helena Parente Cunha (1929-), and Jeanette Winterson (1959-)--three contemporary writers, from Argentina, Brazil, and Great Britain respectively--all write against a male tradition that is validated by its insistence on distinctions between self and other, subject and object, and author. Molloy, in Certificate of Absence (En breve carcel, 1981), Parente Cunha, in Woman Between Mirrors (Mulher no espelho, 1985), and Winterson, in Written on the Body (1992), use the metafictional tropes of narrator-writers and readers to challenge binary thought. First, each eliminates the role of the male or author; second, a is presented who is an adept of both texts and bodies; third, reading is shown to be a physical as well as an intellectual pursuit; and finally, the distinctions between self and other, and author are blurred, frequently through the metaphor of the mirror. By creating metafictional texts, Molloy, Parente Cunha, and Winterson engage a Western literary subgenre that has been especially complicit in the construction of women as passive and nonintellectual readers. The trope of the reader appears during the eighteenth century in the development of the English novel; much of the literary tradition of the passive reader can be traced to Laurence Sterne's novel Tristram Shandy (1760-67) and its negative construction of the Madam Sterne's Madam reader is not as adept as his Gentleman reader and even on second readings misses the point. (1) The reader is carried over into twentieth-century Western literature as well, most notably as the female reader in Julio Cortazar's Hopscotch (1963), In Hopscotch, Cortazar proposes two ways to read, one of which is the female-reading, which involves reading the novel from chapter one through fifty-six, and then stopping, omitting the final ninety-nine chapters; the female-reader will not get beyond the first few pages, rudely lost and scandalized. (2) Following Cortazar, Italo Calvino, in If on a Winter's Night a Traveler (1979), introduces his Reader (who is constructed as a heterosexual male) to a second reader, the Lady Reader: To understand [the position books occupy in your life], our Reader knows that the first step is to visit the kitchen. (3) Calvino is constructing his Lady Reader as inherently domestic; like Sterne and Cortazar, Calvino is curtailing the reader's intellectual possibilities. As we find out nine pages later, the interest of the narrative lies not in the Lady Reader's ability to read, but in her ability to provide sex for the (male) Reader. Milorad Pavic's novel Dictionary of the Khazars (1988) repeats the same biases; the edition of Dictionary of the Khazars emphasizes not reading but emotion: And so, when I began to read the proffered pages, I at one moment lost the train of thought in the text and drowned it in my own feelings. (4) With such a tradition as this, it becomes imperative for women writers to change the dynamic of the woman reader. As a response, I believe, to the reductive definition of women readers, women writers consciously disqualify or exclude male readers and/or writers from their texts. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».