MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1491719275

Dissolving the Reader/Author Binary: Sylvia Molloy's Certificate of Absence , Helena Parente Cunha's Woman Between Mirrors , and Jeanette Winterson's Written on the Body

2002· article· en· W1491719275 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Michael Hardin

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational fiction review · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicContemporary Literature and Criticism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWhite (mutation)Binary oppositionMovie theaterLiteraturePsychoanalysisAllusionArtArt historyPhilosophyPsychology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In Western culture, we have been trained in binary thought: good or evil, white or black, logical or emotional, male or female. One of the consequences of such thought processes is associative, wherein the individual equates all of the terms on one side of the equation: good, white, logical, male or evil, black, emotional, female. Such conclusions have created serious problems for women and people of color, namely the association of evil with being or with being a person of color. One response to binary constructions is to redefine the associations of terms, such that is good or black is good. This, however, does not change the inherent bias of the binary construction. A more radical approach is to challenge binary logic itself, to argue, for example, that such definition is not absolute or even particularly valid. Sylvia Molloy (1938-), Helena Parente Cunha (1929-), and Jeanette Winterson (1959-)--three contemporary writers, from Argentina, Brazil, and Great Britain respectively--all write against a male tradition that is validated by its insistence on distinctions between self and other, subject and object, and author. Molloy, in Certificate of Absence (En breve carcel, 1981), Parente Cunha, in Woman Between Mirrors (Mulher no espelho, 1985), and Winterson, in Written on the Body (1992), use the metafictional tropes of narrator-writers and readers to challenge binary thought. First, each eliminates the role of the male or author; second, a is presented who is an adept of both texts and bodies; third, reading is shown to be a physical as well as an intellectual pursuit; and finally, the distinctions between self and other, and author are blurred, frequently through the metaphor of the mirror. By creating metafictional texts, Molloy, Parente Cunha, and Winterson engage a Western literary subgenre that has been especially complicit in the construction of women as passive and nonintellectual readers. The trope of the reader appears during the eighteenth century in the development of the English novel; much of the literary tradition of the passive reader can be traced to Laurence Sterne's novel Tristram Shandy (1760-67) and its negative construction of the Madam Sterne's Madam reader is not as adept as his Gentleman reader and even on second readings misses the point. (1) The reader is carried over into twentieth-century Western literature as well, most notably as the female reader in Julio Cortazar's Hopscotch (1963), In Hopscotch, Cortazar proposes two ways to read, one of which is the female-reading, which involves reading the novel from chapter one through fifty-six, and then stopping, omitting the final ninety-nine chapters; the female-reader will not get beyond the first few pages, rudely lost and scandalized. (2) Following Cortazar, Italo Calvino, in If on a Winter's Night a Traveler (1979), introduces his Reader (who is constructed as a heterosexual male) to a second reader, the Lady Reader: To understand [the position books occupy in your life], our Reader knows that the first step is to visit the kitchen. (3) Calvino is constructing his Lady Reader as inherently domestic; like Sterne and Cortazar, Calvino is curtailing the reader's intellectual possibilities. As we find out nine pages later, the interest of the narrative lies not in the Lady Reader's ability to read, but in her ability to provide sex for the (male) Reader. Milorad Pavic's novel Dictionary of the Khazars (1988) repeats the same biases; the edition of Dictionary of the Khazars emphasizes not reading but emotion: And so, when I began to read the proffered pages, I at one moment lost the train of thought in the text and drowned it in my own feelings. (4) With such a tradition as this, it becomes imperative for women writers to change the dynamic of the woman reader. As a response, I believe, to the reductive definition of women readers, women writers consciously disqualify or exclude male readers and/or writers from their texts. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.090
Threshold uncertainty score0.178

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0140.016
Scholarly communication0.0080.006
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0030.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.140
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.155 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational fiction reviewSame topicContemporary Literature and CriticismFrench-language works237,207