MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1503861402

A Biography of No Place: From Ethnic Borderland to Soviet Heartland

2005· article· en· W1503861402 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
Bohdan Klid

Notice bibliographique

RevueCanadian Slavonic Papers · 2005
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiquePolish Historical and Cultural Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésUkrainianBiographyGermanEthnic groupHistoryWorld War IIPolitical scienceEthnologyLawArt historyArchaeology
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Kate Brown. A Biography of No Place: From Ethnic Borderland to Soviet Heartland. Cambridge and London: Harvard University Press, 2004.Kate Brown's study, A Biography of No Place: From Ethnic Borderland to Soviet Heartland, is a book about the fate of the inhabitants of a small region Zhytomyr oblast' (a part of Volhynia) from about the mid 1920s to just after the end of World War II. More precisely, the author writes about its Polish and mixed Polish-Ukrainian populace, with some attention also paid to those of German and Jewish heritage. prime geographical focus is on the village of Dovbysh, which from 1925 to 1946 was called Markhlevs'k (in Ukrainian) or Marchlewsk (in Polish). (The author writes Marchlevsk.) During the interwar period, this region was the Ukrainian SSR, but was close to the Polish border. From 1925-35, Markhlevs'k was the capital of the Markhlevs'k Polish Autonomous Region, a territorial-administrative unit created by the Soviet state reflective of the cultural autonomy granted its Polish inhabitants.The Markhlevs'k region was part of what is called the kresy Polish literature, which roughly corresponds to the eastern regions of the former Polish states. These territories constituted a borderland of sorts of Polish colonization. author implies that the book is a study of the kresy, although her primary focus is on a smaller geographic region.From the outset, it is clear that Brown views with sympathy the lives lived by the inhabitants of the borderlands on the eve of the great transformations that overturned the human landscape of the region. She approvingly stresses the uniqueness of its regional- and local-based cultures, and relative economic self sufficiency, which strikes one as somewhat romantic. Borderland residents at that time often described themselves not national terms but as local[s], since identity was tied to locality, class, profession, and social status rather than to nationality... borderland peoples, she writes, up a continuum of cultures that stood literally and figuratively on the border between Poland, Ukraine, and Russia, a place where mass media had not yet standardized vernaculars or made boilerplates of ritual and tradition.The author examines the lives of these inhabitants through the early Soviet period and then for the brief period of Nazi German occupation, and mentions, but docs not discuss, the mass deportations of Poles upon the return of Soviet rule. She focuses mainly on the policies of the Soviet and German states, explaining why they were formulated, how they were carried out and, finally, what effects they had on the lives of the borderland population. She also briefly writes on the policies and actions of non-state actors, such as the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists and Ukrainian Insurgent Army toward the Polish population of Volhynia.These policies, and the actions which followed from them, their totality, the author writes, transformed radically the region from a multi-ethnic border zone into a largely homogenous Ukrainian heartland: The progressive and punitive actions of Soviet polity, the enactment of National Socialist hierarchies, the OUN and UPA attacks on non-Ukrainian inhabitants, the postwar Polish and Soviet government population transfers sanctioned by the larger European community-all worked tandem with the generalizing, standardizing efforts of modern governance to arrange and simplify the region's cultural complexity.Generalizing from this, she concludes that today's independent Ukraine is a creation which the streamlining of hybrid identities into national groups, the deportation of people as national minorities, the Nazi imposition of racial hierarchies, the Holocaust, the Soviet annexation of Polish territory, and the Polish and Soviet population transfers all played major roles creating unambiguously Ukrainian nation-space. She makes this assertion not to call into question Ukraine's statehood, she claims, but rather to describe in depth a process which has occurred, and is occurring, many places across the globe-in Ireland, India, Lebanon, Palestine, Rwanda, the Balkans-in the hope of underscoring. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,018
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,036

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,003
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0050,007
Communication savante0,0050,005
Science ouverte0,0010,003
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,004
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0060,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,018
Tête enseignante GPT0,275
Écart entre enseignants0,257 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2005
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCanadian Slavonic PapersMême sujetPolish Historical and Cultural StudiesTravaux en français237 207