MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1512340305 · doi:10.1353/chl.2010.a380771

Anne of Green Gables : Criticism after a Century

2010· article· en· W1512340305 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ann F. Howey

Notice bibliographique

RevueChildren's literature · 2010
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueFolklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésCriticismScholarshipHistoryCentennialFellArt historyMedia studiesClassicsArtSociologyLawLiteraturePolitical scienceArchaeologyGeographyCartography

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Anne of Green Gables: Criticism after a Century Ann F. Howey (bio) Storm and Dissonance: L. M. Montgomery and Conflict, edited by Jean Mitchell. Newcastle on Tyne, Eng.: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2008. 100 Years of Anne with an 'e': The Centennial Study of Anne of Green Gables, edited by Holly Blackford. Calgary, AB: U of Calgary P, 2009. The centenary of the publication of L. M. Montgomery's Anne of Green Gables (1908–2008) itself saw many publications: newspaper articles reflecting on Anne's place in Canadian life, fiction (most notably Budge Wilson's Before Green Gables, the authorized prequel to Montgomery's novel), and scholarly works. Special issues of journals, single-authored monographs, and collections of essays revisited the novel that launched a series, a tourist destination, and an academic industry. Both Storm and Dissonance and 100 Years of Anne with an 'e' are evidence of the vitality of that industry. Although the essays in Storm and Dissonance began as conference papers in 2006 and are thus less explicitly connected to the centenary, both collections offer the opportunity to reflect not just on Anne's and Montgomery's places within Canadian culture and literature, but also on the changing nature of scholarship on the novel and on Montgomery's works generally. The Seventh Biennial International L. M. Montgomery Conference, held in Charlottetown, PE, in 2006, was the genesis of the essays collected in Storm and Dissonance, since the conference was organized around topics related to conflict in Montgomery's life and writings in general. Previous conferences have also produced collections of essays: for example, L. M. Montgomery and Canadian Culture ; Making Avonlea: L. M. Montgomery and Popular Culture; and The Intimate Life of L. M. Montgomery. Just as the conferences themselves facilitate scholarly conversations about Montgomery's writings, these essay collections—and Storm and Dissonance is no exception—recreate that sense of scholarly conversation, particularly since contributors refer to one another's essays. This strategy also seeks to create, as the editor says in the acknowledgements, "a coherent collection of essays" (xiii). The volume is organized into five sections: "Narrating Self and Other" (three essays); "A World of Conflict and Private Sorrows" (four [End Page 249] essays); "Performing Difference(s)" (six essays); "Avoiding, Mediating, and Resolving Conflicts" (four essays); and "Troubling Translations and Dissonant Readings" (five essays). In addition, Mitchell provides an introduction, while a short, personal reflection on Montgomery and Island readers by Jane Ledwell closes the collection. Some of the sections are quite unified: all four essays of "A World of Conflict," for example, explore the relationship between major sociopolitical occurrences (World Wars I and II, the Great Depression) and Montgomery's writing. Other sections are more diverse: the last ranges from recent Canadian media representations of Anne, to German and Japanese translations of the novel, to Montgomery family history, to an eco-feminist reading of Montgomery, using Anne of Green Gables, Emily of New Moon, and The Blue Castle as examples. The diversity of such sections is appealing, however, in part because it testifies to the multiple perspectives that have been and continue to be brought to bear on Montgomery's works. Moreover, the unity of the collection as a whole is not compromised, for as Mitchell acknowledges in her introduction, there are themes that cross the section divisions: she identifies recurring concerns with "Shadows and Light" in Montgomery's work (2–3); with Montgomery's depiction of the "everyday" and her own cultivated "cosmopolitanism" (3–4); with "place" as "central to . . . the identities of her heroines" (5); with anxieties about change (6–7); and with the generational gaps and gender roles that cause conflict (8–9). The sections thus group roughly similar topics, presumably for readers to find related articles more easily, but these underlying themes emerge in essays throughout the collection. I would argue, however, that the real strength of the book is in its diversity, not its unity. Whether the conflict explored is confrontational (storm) or more gentle (dissonance), scholars have found many different aspects of Montgomery's writing that reveal conflict. Given the author's oft-cited advice about "realism" in writing—"Flower-gardens are just as real [as pig-sties] and...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,007
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,017
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,329
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,654

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0070,017
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0030,004
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0250,038
Communication savante0,0130,006
Science ouverte0,0020,005
Intégrité de la recherche0,0080,007
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0060,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,005
Tête enseignante GPT0,206
Écart entre enseignants0,200 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2010
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueChildren's literatureMême sujetFolklore, Mythology, and Literature StudiesTravaux en français237 207