MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1514236001 · doi:10.1071/rdv16n1ab27

27 BIRTH OF AFRICA’S FIRST NUCLEAR-TRANSFERRED ANIMAL PRODUCED WITH HANDMADE CLONING

2004· article· en· W1514236001 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

affAu moins un auteur déclare une institution canadienne dans l'instantané OpenAlex épinglé.
fundUn bailleur canadien est enregistré sur le travail.

Notice bibliographique

RevueReproduction Fertility and Development · 2004
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueReproductive Biology and Fertility
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Guelph
Organismes subventionnairesInternational Council for Canadian StudiesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaTürkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma KurumuOntario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs
Mots-clésBiologyTheriogenologyAndrologyCloning (programming)Somatic cell nuclear transferBlastocystReproductive technologyAnatomyAnimal scienceEmbryoCryopreservationCell biologyEmbryogenesis

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Cloning technology has the potential to stimulate the development of the animal biotechnology industry in southern Africa, as well as provide conservationists with an additional tool to possibly assist with conserving critically endangered wildlife species sometime in the future. The aim of this study was to determine whether cloning could produce blastocysts and possibly live progeny in a field-type laboratory without micromanipulators and CO2 incubator. Approx. 1 × 1-cm ear skin notches were surgically removed from a physically immobilized 9-year-old Holstein cow, a former South African milk production record holder. The tissues were placed into physiological saline and transported to the laboratory at 4°C within 2 h, cleaned with chlorohexidine gluconate and sliced finely in Minimal Essential Medium supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum. The resultant tissue explants were treated as previously described (Bartels et al., 2003 Theriogenology 59, 387) and actively growing fibroblast cultures were made available for the nuclear transfer process. Bovine oocytes from slaughterhouse-derived ovaries were collected and matured for 21 h in modified TCM-199 medium supplemented with 15% cattle serum, 10 IU mL-1 eCG and 15 IU mL-1 hCG. Nuclear transfer was performed using the HMC technique (Vajta et al., 2003 Biol. Reprod. 68, 571–578). At 21 h after the start of maturation, cumulus cells and zonae pellucidae were removed and oocytes were randomly bisected by hand. Cytoplasts were selected using Hoechst staining and a fluorescent microscope. After a two-step fusion, reconstructed embryos were activated with calcium ionophore and dimethylaminopurine. Culture was performed in SOFaaci medium supplemented with 5% cattle serum using WOWs (Vajta et al., Mol. Reprod. Dev. 50, 185–191). All incubations including culture of donor cells were performed in the submarine incubator system (SIS; Vajta et al., 1997 Theriogenology 48, 1379–1385). In two consecutive experiments, 6 blastocysts were produced from 52 reconstructed embryos. On Day 7, 5 blastocysts were selected for transfer into 3 previously synchronized recipients. All three recipients became pregnant, but two of the recipients aborted at six and seven months, respectively. Post-mortem examination on the first aborted fetus did not reveal any identifiable etiology, but coincided with 6 abortions from natural pregnancies during a heat wave, while the organism Brucella abortis was isolated from the second aborted fetus. The third pregnancy went to term, and a healthy calf, weighing 27 kg, was delivered by Caesarean section. The three-month-old calf is being raised by a surrogate Jersey cow under standard dairy conditions and is expected to join the dairy in eighteen months’ time. The birth of ‘Futhi’, meaning ‘replicate’ in Zulu, is Africa’s first cloned animal and signifies an important milestone in the development of animal biotechnology in Africa.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,351
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,676

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,030
Tête enseignante GPT0,240
Écart entre enseignants0,211 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle