MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1514236001 · doi:10.1071/rdv16n1ab27

27 BIRTH OF AFRICA’S FIRST NUCLEAR-TRANSFERRED ANIMAL PRODUCED WITH HANDMADE CLONING

2004· article· en· W1514236001 on OpenAlexafffund
Paul Bartels, Jennifer Joubert, M. de la Rey, R. de la Rey, Robert Treadwell, Henrik Callesen, Gábor Vajta

Bibliographic record

VenueReproduction Fertility and Development · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicReproductive Biology and Fertility
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersInternational Council for Canadian StudiesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaTürkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma KurumuOntario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs
KeywordsBiologyTheriogenologyAndrologyCloning (programming)Somatic cell nuclear transferBlastocystReproductive technologyAnatomyAnimal scienceEmbryoCryopreservationCell biologyEmbryogenesis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cloning technology has the potential to stimulate the development of the animal biotechnology industry in southern Africa, as well as provide conservationists with an additional tool to possibly assist with conserving critically endangered wildlife species sometime in the future. The aim of this study was to determine whether cloning could produce blastocysts and possibly live progeny in a field-type laboratory without micromanipulators and CO2 incubator. Approx. 1 × 1-cm ear skin notches were surgically removed from a physically immobilized 9-year-old Holstein cow, a former South African milk production record holder. The tissues were placed into physiological saline and transported to the laboratory at 4°C within 2 h, cleaned with chlorohexidine gluconate and sliced finely in Minimal Essential Medium supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum. The resultant tissue explants were treated as previously described (Bartels et al., 2003 Theriogenology 59, 387) and actively growing fibroblast cultures were made available for the nuclear transfer process. Bovine oocytes from slaughterhouse-derived ovaries were collected and matured for 21 h in modified TCM-199 medium supplemented with 15% cattle serum, 10 IU mL-1 eCG and 15 IU mL-1 hCG. Nuclear transfer was performed using the HMC technique (Vajta et al., 2003 Biol. Reprod. 68, 571–578). At 21 h after the start of maturation, cumulus cells and zonae pellucidae were removed and oocytes were randomly bisected by hand. Cytoplasts were selected using Hoechst staining and a fluorescent microscope. After a two-step fusion, reconstructed embryos were activated with calcium ionophore and dimethylaminopurine. Culture was performed in SOFaaci medium supplemented with 5% cattle serum using WOWs (Vajta et al., Mol. Reprod. Dev. 50, 185–191). All incubations including culture of donor cells were performed in the submarine incubator system (SIS; Vajta et al., 1997 Theriogenology 48, 1379–1385). In two consecutive experiments, 6 blastocysts were produced from 52 reconstructed embryos. On Day 7, 5 blastocysts were selected for transfer into 3 previously synchronized recipients. All three recipients became pregnant, but two of the recipients aborted at six and seven months, respectively. Post-mortem examination on the first aborted fetus did not reveal any identifiable etiology, but coincided with 6 abortions from natural pregnancies during a heat wave, while the organism Brucella abortis was isolated from the second aborted fetus. The third pregnancy went to term, and a healthy calf, weighing 27 kg, was delivered by Caesarean section. The three-month-old calf is being raised by a surrogate Jersey cow under standard dairy conditions and is expected to join the dairy in eighteen months’ time. The birth of ‘Futhi’, meaning ‘replicate’ in Zulu, is Africa’s first cloned animal and signifies an important milestone in the development of animal biotechnology in Africa.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.033

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReproduction Fertility and DevelopmentSame topicReproductive Biology and FertilityFrench-language works237,207