Notice bibliographique
Résumé
BAC KGROUND Participating in skiing and snowboarding is a great way to encourage physical activity in youth. Current safety guidelines for physical activity in Alberta schools suggest that skiing and snowboarding are suitable for grades 4-12 [1]. As a number of schools follow these guidelines, we set out to evaluate age-specific incidence and nature of ski and snowboard related injuries in school-aged children. METHODS Historical cohort study; participants were children and youth who presented to the ski patrol after sustaining a ski or snowboard injury during the 2013-2014 season at a ski area in Southern Alberta (N=198). Injury information was extracted from Accident Report Forms (ARF) completed by the ski patrol. Rate denominator data were obtained from school enrolment forms. Outcome measures included injury rates and injury severity. Injured participants were defined as skiers or snowboarders injured at the ski area that presented to ski patrol. Severe injuries were defined as those where the destination on the ARF was indicated as “hospital”. Severity was compared among those <8, 8-12 and13-17 years old. RESULTS Ninety-two of 198 (46%) injuries reported to the ski patrol were severe. Preliminary analyses indicated higher odds of severe injury for those 13-17 (OR 4.59; 1.44-18.08) compared with those <8 (reference) and 8-12 (OR 1.66; 0.52-6.5) years old. Males (OR 2.43; 1.25-4.92), snowboarders (OR 2.07; 1.14-3.82), and those injured while jumping (OR 4.33; 1.74-11.44) had greater odds of severe injury, in comparison with females, alpine skiers, and those in lessons. There was evidence that participating in a ski/snowboard school program reduced the likelihood of severe injury (OR 0.46; 0.24-0.90). Adolescents (13-17 year olds) had a higher rate of injury (437/10,000 visits) than children (≤12) (175/10,000 visits). The rate of snowboarder injury (205/10,000 visits) was almost 3 times higher than the rate in skiers (69/10,000 visits). Snowboarders had a higher incidence of fractures and upper extremity injuries, while skiers had a higher incidence of lower extremity injuries. Trunk and head injury rates were similar for skiers and snowboarders. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS Preliminary results indicated that younger participants and those in school programs had lower odds of severe injury. Future work will involve more advanced regression analyses to adjust for additional potential confounding factors. We will also continue to explore factors that contribute to higher risk of injury for adolescents in subsequent analyses.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».