MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1518805802

Ski and Snowboard School Programs: Incidence and Risk Factors for Injury

2014· article· en· W1518805802 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
R Sran

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of undergraduate research in Alberta · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicWinter Sports Injuries and Performance
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIncidence (geometry)Injury preventionMedicinePoison controlOccupational safety and healthHuman factors and ergonomicsSuicide preventionPhysical therapyCohortDemographyOdds ratioMedical emergencyInternal medicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BAC KGROUND Participating in skiing and snowboarding is a great way to encourage physical activity in youth. Current safety guidelines for physical activity in Alberta schools suggest that skiing and snowboarding are suitable for grades 4-12 [1]. As a number of schools follow these guidelines, we set out to evaluate age-specific incidence and nature of ski and snowboard related injuries in school-aged children. METHODS Historical cohort study; participants were children and youth who presented to the ski patrol after sustaining a ski or snowboard injury during the 2013-2014 season at a ski area in Southern Alberta (N=198). Injury information was extracted from Accident Report Forms (ARF) completed by the ski patrol. Rate denominator data were obtained from school enrolment forms. Outcome measures included injury rates and injury severity. Injured participants were defined as skiers or snowboarders injured at the ski area that presented to ski patrol. Severe injuries were defined as those where the destination on the ARF was indicated as “hospital”. Severity was compared among those <8, 8-12 and13-17 years old. RESULTS Ninety-two of 198 (46%) injuries reported to the ski patrol were severe. Preliminary analyses indicated higher odds of severe injury for those 13-17 (OR 4.59; 1.44-18.08) compared with those <8 (reference) and 8-12 (OR 1.66; 0.52-6.5) years old. Males (OR 2.43; 1.25-4.92), snowboarders (OR 2.07; 1.14-3.82), and those injured while jumping (OR 4.33; 1.74-11.44) had greater odds of severe injury, in comparison with females, alpine skiers, and those in lessons. There was evidence that participating in a ski/snowboard school program reduced the likelihood of severe injury (OR 0.46; 0.24-0.90). Adolescents (13-17 year olds) had a higher rate of injury (437/10,000 visits) than children (≤12) (175/10,000 visits). The rate of snowboarder injury (205/10,000 visits) was almost 3 times higher than the rate in skiers (69/10,000 visits). Snowboarders had a higher incidence of fractures and upper extremity injuries, while skiers had a higher incidence of lower extremity injuries. Trunk and head injury rates were similar for skiers and snowboarders. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS Preliminary results indicated that younger participants and those in school programs had lower odds of severe injury. Future work will involve more advanced regression analyses to adjust for additional potential confounding factors. We will also continue to explore factors that contribute to higher risk of injury for adolescents in subsequent analyses.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.490
Threshold uncertainty score0.388

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.368
Teacher spread0.330 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of undergraduate research in AlbertaSame topicWinter Sports Injuries and PerformanceFrench-language works237,207