Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Working Families: The Transformation of the American Home. Rosanna Hertz and Nancy L. Marshall, eds. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. 2001. 389 pp. ISBN 0-520-- 22649-6. $19.95 (paper). Research on work and family has proliferated in recent years. These efforts have been helped along by financial support from the Alfred E. Sloan Foundation's program on Working Families, as well as support from other organizations, such as the Families and Work Institute and the Business and Professional Women's Foundation. Rosanna Hertz and Nancy L. Marshall's edited volume represents one tangible product resulting from these collaborations. Many of the papers in the book were presented at a 1998 national conference on work and family, cosponsored by the Sloan Foundation and the Business and Professional Women's Foundation. That this conference-which brings together scholars from many disciplines, human resource personnel, and other practitioners in the work and family field-has now become an annual event testifies to the value of this financial and institutional support for workfamily research. Working Families' 18 chapters are distributed across four major sections; the first focuses on changing families, the second on changes (or the lack of) in the workplace, and the third examines the gendered nature of both domains as experienced by working mothers and fathers themselves. The book's final section focuses on children, an important but all-too-often ignored constituency in work-family research. In contrast to the uneven quality of many edited volumes drawn from conference proceedings, all of the papers in this collection have something valuable to say. The vast majority discuss original research and do so in a style likely to have its greatest appeal to researchers, work-family professionals, and graduate students. Quantitative research dominates this volume. For the most part, this research is presented with enough technical and methodological details to make it useful to other researchers. Qualitative papers by Arlie Hochschild, Lillian Rubin, and Barrie Thorne (among others) round out the collection. Each section of Working Families contains at least one key paper; that is, it contains a paper that is not only strong empirically, but that also breaks new conceptual ground. For example, in their chapter in the Families section, Phyllis Moen and Shin Kap-Han urge a rethinking of traditional notions of occupational careers. They opt instead for life course perspective that attends to the multiplex pathways women and men pursue in the contemporary era. The proceeding chapter-Lillian Rubin's examination of people who begin families in mid-life-reinforces Moen and Han's suggestion that work-family researchers attend more closely to the reconfigured life course. Harriet Gross' chapter on Work, Family, and Globalization (in the section on work) also challenges work-family researchers. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,015 | 0,011 |
| Communication savante | 0,010 | 0,008 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,006 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,008 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».