MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1519084158 · doi:10.1353/esc.2004.0005

The Yaddo Records: How An Institutional Archive Reveals Creative Insights

2004· article· en· W1519084158 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ben Alexander

Notice bibliographique

RevueEnglish studies in Canada · 2004
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueArchaeology and Natural History
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésTributeThe artsExcellenceArt historyCreativityPaintingHistoryRepresentation (politics)SociologyArtVisual artsLawPolitical sciencePolitics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The Yaddo Records: H ow An Institutional Archive Reveals Creative Insights Ben Alexander Manuscripts Specialist, N ew York Public Library O n the after n o o n of Septem ber 7,1968, members of the Corpo­ ration of Yaddo, the reclusive artists’ retreat located in Saratoga Springs, New York, met to pay tribute to Elizabeth Ames, Executive Director of Yaddo from 1924-1968 (see Figure 13). Ames was then 88 years old and had held her title since Yaddo first opened its doors to creative “guests” in 1926. John Cheever, whose relationship with both Ames and Yaddo was especially intimate, recognized Ames’ 42 years of service by describing the tremendous creativity, which occurred at Yaddo during her tenure, The forty or so acres on which the studios and principle build­ ings of Yaddo stand have seen more distinguished activity in the arts than any other piece of ground in the English-speak­ ing community or perhaps in the entire world. As we all know, more than twelve hundred guests have stayed at Yaddo. The diversity, quantity and excellence of the work done here is staggering. There has never been anything like it. Many of the men and women responsible for the vitality in American art have done their major work in these rooms. Every sort of school of painting, music and literature has been represented and in some cases initiated here. (Six Decades 5) ESC 30.1 (March 2004): 86-100 Reference to Yaddo’s guest list helps to corroborate Cheever’s, seemingly, presumptuous claim. Since 1926, Yaddo has helped foster the work of Newton Arvin, James Baldwin, Leonard Bernstein, Elizabeth Bishop, Aaron Copland, Malcolm Cowley, Truman Capote, Langston Hughes, Jacob Lawrence, Robert Lowell, Carson McCullers, Flannery O ’Connor, Katherine Anne Porter, Clyfford Still, and William Carlos Williams. However, despite its contribution, Yaddo has remained enigmatic, often referred to in biographical studies, but never itself the subject of critical inquiry. The reason is simple. Before October 2002, when The New York Public Library released Yaddo’s archival record, focused study of Yaddo remained, essentially, impossible. While it is without question that the Yaddo Records will yield important insights, the composition of this archive raises critical questions about accepted modes of archival inquiry. The Yaddo Records are comprised of family, institutional, and adminis­ trative papers. Not represented are manuscripts and typescripts of works composed at Yaddo. W hile these manuscripts (which are, in general, preserved by other archives) are important because they document the gestation of compositions which took shape amid Yaddo’s environment of creative quietism, they have a finite value in terms of their critical importance. That is to say that there exists an essential moment when a creative manuscript no longer yields to critical interpretation and its value becomes, largely, artifactual. Institutional archives like the Yaddo Records document an essential, and overlooked, intersection between the critical importance of manuscripts and typescripts of creative works, and the material record which preserves the historical circumstances surrounding, and influencing, their development. As literary manuscripts exhaust their critical value, such moments of intersection become increasingly impor­ tant, and the reward for the scholar who locates them, greater still. Careful analysis of the Yaddo Records reveals two prominent moments of convergence. First, the Yaddo Records trace the origins of a community which, as Cheever describes, witnessed the creativity of many regarded artists. Secondly, Yaddo’s archive reveals that during its most formative years an emerging group of intellectual and creative thinkers were respon­ sible for shaping Yaddo’s restrictive guest list, and that their decisions fused with Ames’ administrative authority in ways which proved formative to regarded compositions. For Cheever, Yaddo’s record of fostering artistic development was deeply rooted in a combination of Elizabeth Ames’ administrative genius, Ben Alexander is a Specialist in the Manuscripts and Archives Division at The New York Public Library where he was responsible for processing the Yaddo Records. Mr Alexander holds an ma in English from Columbia University and is completing his dissertation, a history of Yaddo, at The City University of New York. He has lectured on Yaddo and its archival record in, among other places, Los Angeles, London, Paris, and Vienna. Mr Alexander also...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,642
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,002
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,027
Tête enseignante GPT0,289
Écart entre enseignants0,262 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2004
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueEnglish studies in CanadaMême sujetArchaeology and Natural HistoryTravaux en français237 207