The Yaddo Records: How An Institutional Archive Reveals Creative Insights
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Yaddo Records: H ow An Institutional Archive Reveals Creative Insights Ben Alexander Manuscripts Specialist, N ew York Public Library O n the after n o o n of Septem ber 7,1968, members of the Corpo ration of Yaddo, the reclusive artists’ retreat located in Saratoga Springs, New York, met to pay tribute to Elizabeth Ames, Executive Director of Yaddo from 1924-1968 (see Figure 13). Ames was then 88 years old and had held her title since Yaddo first opened its doors to creative “guests” in 1926. John Cheever, whose relationship with both Ames and Yaddo was especially intimate, recognized Ames’ 42 years of service by describing the tremendous creativity, which occurred at Yaddo during her tenure, The forty or so acres on which the studios and principle build ings of Yaddo stand have seen more distinguished activity in the arts than any other piece of ground in the English-speak ing community or perhaps in the entire world. As we all know, more than twelve hundred guests have stayed at Yaddo. The diversity, quantity and excellence of the work done here is staggering. There has never been anything like it. Many of the men and women responsible for the vitality in American art have done their major work in these rooms. Every sort of school of painting, music and literature has been represented and in some cases initiated here. (Six Decades 5) ESC 30.1 (March 2004): 86-100 Reference to Yaddo’s guest list helps to corroborate Cheever’s, seemingly, presumptuous claim. Since 1926, Yaddo has helped foster the work of Newton Arvin, James Baldwin, Leonard Bernstein, Elizabeth Bishop, Aaron Copland, Malcolm Cowley, Truman Capote, Langston Hughes, Jacob Lawrence, Robert Lowell, Carson McCullers, Flannery O ’Connor, Katherine Anne Porter, Clyfford Still, and William Carlos Williams. However, despite its contribution, Yaddo has remained enigmatic, often referred to in biographical studies, but never itself the subject of critical inquiry. The reason is simple. Before October 2002, when The New York Public Library released Yaddo’s archival record, focused study of Yaddo remained, essentially, impossible. While it is without question that the Yaddo Records will yield important insights, the composition of this archive raises critical questions about accepted modes of archival inquiry. The Yaddo Records are comprised of family, institutional, and adminis trative papers. Not represented are manuscripts and typescripts of works composed at Yaddo. W hile these manuscripts (which are, in general, preserved by other archives) are important because they document the gestation of compositions which took shape amid Yaddo’s environment of creative quietism, they have a finite value in terms of their critical importance. That is to say that there exists an essential moment when a creative manuscript no longer yields to critical interpretation and its value becomes, largely, artifactual. Institutional archives like the Yaddo Records document an essential, and overlooked, intersection between the critical importance of manuscripts and typescripts of creative works, and the material record which preserves the historical circumstances surrounding, and influencing, their development. As literary manuscripts exhaust their critical value, such moments of intersection become increasingly impor tant, and the reward for the scholar who locates them, greater still. Careful analysis of the Yaddo Records reveals two prominent moments of convergence. First, the Yaddo Records trace the origins of a community which, as Cheever describes, witnessed the creativity of many regarded artists. Secondly, Yaddo’s archive reveals that during its most formative years an emerging group of intellectual and creative thinkers were respon sible for shaping Yaddo’s restrictive guest list, and that their decisions fused with Ames’ administrative authority in ways which proved formative to regarded compositions. For Cheever, Yaddo’s record of fostering artistic development was deeply rooted in a combination of Elizabeth Ames’ administrative genius, Ben Alexander is a Specialist in the Manuscripts and Archives Division at The New York Public Library where he was responsible for processing the Yaddo Records. Mr Alexander holds an ma in English from Columbia University and is completing his dissertation, a history of Yaddo, at The City University of New York. He has lectured on Yaddo and its archival record in, among other places, Los Angeles, London, Paris, and Vienna. Mr Alexander also...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".