Moral coherence and value pluralism
Pourquoi ce travail est-il dans la base ?
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Le tri à trois modèles
les 1 000 travaux triés →Les trois modèles l'ont jugé hors champ.
Philosophy paper on moral coherence, systematicity, and value pluralism; scientific reasoning appears only as an analogy, so the object is moral epistemology rather than research practice.
This philosophical paper concerns moral reasoning and only uses scientific reasoning as an analogy, not as its object.
Moral philosophy on value pluralism and coherence; science is only an analogy, not the object.
Résumé
This paper addresses the question of what value pluralism tells us about the pursuit of moral coherence as a method of moral reasoning. I focus on the status of the norm of ‘systematicity, ’ or the demand that our principles be as few and as simple as possible. I argue that, given certain descriptive facts about the pluralistic ways we value, epistemic ways of supporting a systematicity norm do not succeed. Because it is sometimes suggested that coherence functions in moral reasoning as it does in scientific reasoning, my argument considers analogies and disanalogies between moral reasoning and scientific reasoning.
Conservé avec la notice de tri, où il sert de preuve aux étiquettes ci-dessus.
La notice
- Revue
- Canadian Journal of Philosophy
- Thématique
- Ethics in medical practice
- Domaine
- Health Professions
- Établissements canadiens
- University of Waterloo
- Organismes subventionnaires
- —
- Mots-clés
- EpistemologyPluralism (philosophy)Moral reasoningCoherence (philosophical gambling strategy)Norm (philosophy)Argument (complex analysis)SociologyPsychologyPhilosophyMathematics
- Résumé présent dans OpenAlex
- oui