MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1529687391

Distribution and fate of energetics on DoD test and training ranges : interim report 5

2006· article· en· W1529687391 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Judith C. Pennington, Thomas F. Jenkins, Sonia Thiboutot, Guy Ampleman, Jay Clausen, Alan D. Hewitt, J Lewis, Michael R. Walsh, Marianne E. Walsh, Thomas A. Ranney

Notice bibliographique

RevueUS Army Corps of Engineers: Engineer Research and Development Center (Knowledge Core) · 2006
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEnvironmental Science
ThématiqueChemical Analysis and Environmental Impact
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesCold Regions Research and Engineering LaboratoryEngineer Research and Development CenterU.S. Army Corps of EngineersStrategic Environmental Research and Development Program
Mots-clésEnvironmental scienceExplosive materialSampling (signal processing)DetonationContaminationPropellantEngineeringChemistryAerospace engineeringEcology
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The DoD has a mandate of environmental stewardship as well as military readiness.Therefore, the concern that training with live munitions potentially generates undesirable residual constituents is of interest.The objective of this study is to develop techniques for assessing the potential for environmental contamination from energetic materials on testing and training ranges.The project defines the physical and chemical properties, concentrations, and distribution of residues in soils, and the potential for transport of these residues to groundwater.Surface soils associated with impact craters, targets areas, and firing points were characterized on 18 military installations in the United States and Canada.Residues from high-order, low-order, unconfined charge, and blow-in-place detonations were collected on witness plates, snow, and/or tarps for constituent analyses.Results of these analyses were used to characterize residue composition and spatial distribution in relationship to the types of training activities conducted.Results also contributed to development of surface soil sampling strategies for live-fire ranges.Transport parameters of contaminants of potential concern for which data are lacking were determined by leveraging this project with other funding sources.The characteristics of constituent residues on training ranges, both chemical composition and aerial distribution, vary with the type of range activity and the specific munitions fired.Residues tend to be localized in highly distributed point sources in the vicinity of targets and fixed firing positions.Characterizing these sites requires careful consideration of soil sampling strategies based on site activities and will typically include multi-increment composite sampling.Special care must be taken in laboratory subsampling since residues occur as solid particles of various sizes that are highly heterogeneously dispersed in the soil.For the types of ranges studied, e.g., heavy artillery and hand grenade ranges, RDX is a significant contaminant of concern.TNT, which is typically restricted to surface soil, poses less threat to groundwater than RDX.At firing points, propellant residues can be significant.High-order detonations, which constitute most of the explosions executed during training, generate undetectable to barely detectable, diffuse surface residuals; however, low-order detonations, the incidences of which are much lower than high-order detonations and which tend to be munitions-specific, are a potentially significant source of residues.Another issue with potential to generate significant residues is clearance of unexploded ordnance by blowing in place.Rendering safe does not always result in complete consumption of explosive charge.Therefore, care must be exercised to achieve complete detonations with secondary changes that do not contribute munitions constituents, especially RDX, to the soil.Results of fate and transport studies indicate that initial release of energetics from compositions, such as Composition B, into soils tends to be locally very high, approaching temperature-dependent aqueous phase saturation, even though the compositions dissolve more slowly than the solubilities of the individual components would suggest.Furthermore, soil adsorption from solution phase, which is governed to some extent by soil properties, will not significantly limit transport.Therefore, RDX is readily transportable to groundwater.TNT transforms readily to mono-amino products, the transport of which is limited by covalent bonding of these transformation products to soils components.Results of this study provide a technical basis for development of range-specific soil characterization approaches.Results also provide process descriptors for fate and transport of constituent residues and for assessing the exposure component of environmental risk assessments.The relationships emerging between various training activities and constituent residues provide a sound scientific basis for development of management practices for sustainment of training range activities while maintaining environmental stewardship.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,095
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,188

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,045
Tête enseignante GPT0,283
Écart entre enseignants0,238 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations106
Publié2006
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueUS Army Corps of Engineers: Engineer Research and Development Center (Knowledge Core)Même sujetChemical Analysis and Environmental ImpactTravaux en français237 207