Notice bibliographique
Résumé
PENNY FRANCIS, PUPPETRY: A READER IN THEATRE PRACTICE (BASINGSTOKE: PAIERAVE MACMILLAN, 2012), AND DORITA HANNAH AND 01AV HARSLOF (EDS), PERFURMAHCE BESIEH (COPENHAGEN: MUSEUM TUSCUIANUM PRESS, 2008)Penny Francis, MBE, has been deeply involved in the world of puppetry since 1961 as a writer, lecturer and editor. She was thus an ideal candidate for Palgrave Macmillan to commission for the somewhat under-documented form of puppetry for its series of Readers in Theatre Practice. The series 'aims to gather together both key historical texts and contemporary ways of thinking about the material crafts and practices of the theatre' and, further, wants to 'position the doing in relation to the thinking about doing or the thinking about the materials being used' (xiii).Francis's concise but comprehensive book does all that was asked of it, and more. Its main focus is on puppetry's evolution from the 1990s to the present - mainly from a modern European perspective, but with useful reference to ancient Asian traditions such as the Japanese Bunraku-za and the Indonesian wayang as well as to the Italian commedia dell'arte, forerunner to such enduring puppet characters as Punch and Pulcinello. For Francis's purposes, puppetry 'denotes the act of bringing to imagined life inert figures and forms (representational or abstract) for a ritual or theatrical purpose - for a performance' (5; her emphasis). She adds that it springs from two taproots: 'one nourishes its magic and illusion, its dramaturgy of ritual and religion ... [and] the other nourishes the broad branches of its comedy, parody and satire' (6). Both threads are thoroughly pursued here, along with other hybrid applications in which boundaries are blurred.The book is arranged in seven chapters; the first, titled 'Approach', covers basics like puppetry: the art and the act; puppet theatre and a theatre with puppets; the puppet: animated figure and object; the animated object; and the puppeteer. Chapter Two insightfully examines the related arts of mask, automata - including the brilliant, mechanically operated theatrum mundi of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries - and ventriloquism. The third chapter is devoted to Operational Techniques', covering a broad spectrum of styles from marionettes, glove- and hand-puppets, rods of various kinds, shadows and silhouettes, black light and black theatre, the toy and model theatres and, finally, bunraku. There is even room for brief mention of the extraordinary Vietnamese water-puppets. Here, as elsewhere throughout the book, each sub-section is very well illustrated with vivid descriptions of actual performances as well as by a beautiful selection of aptly chosen monochrome photos.In Chapter Four, titled 'In Performance', the focus shifts to the artists, practitioners and artisans of the puppeteer's professions, beginning with the recent trend for groups of collaborators to devise their shows. Francis then considers the shifting roles of the writer; the director; and the designer and maker (together with lighting and sound designers) - including, crucially, the increasing contemporary need in mixed puppet-and-human shows for puppeteers to be excellent performers, even actors, as well as manipulators. This is followed by a finely nuanced chapter on 'Dramaturgy', as distinct from the more orthodox notion of 'writing'; it is illustrated with a lengthy and telling extract from the Canadian marionettist Ronnie Burkett's Billy Twinkle (2009) and it is probably one the most illuminating chapters in the book. Less so is Chapter Six's reproduction of five articles on aesthetics in puppetry, including Heinrich von Kleist's famous 1810 treatise 'On The Marionette Theatre', Henryk Jurkowski's sobering 'Puppetry Aesthetics at the Start of the Twenty-first Century' (2000) and Roland Barthes' rather confusing 'On Bunraku' of 1971. Given that key ideas like 'aesthetic' and aesthetics' are canvassed so widely elsewhere in the book, I wondered why we needed these. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».