MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1531432897

Puppetry: A Reader in Theatre Practice

2012· article· en· W1531432897 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Geoffrey Milne

Bibliographic record

VenueAustralasian drama studies · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicTheatre and Performance Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPuppetryComedyMAGIC (telescope)Theatre studiesVisual artsArtArt historyLiteratureHistoryDrama
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PENNY FRANCIS, PUPPETRY: A READER IN THEATRE PRACTICE (BASINGSTOKE: PAIERAVE MACMILLAN, 2012), AND DORITA HANNAH AND 01AV HARSLOF (EDS), PERFURMAHCE BESIEH (COPENHAGEN: MUSEUM TUSCUIANUM PRESS, 2008)Penny Francis, MBE, has been deeply involved in the world of puppetry since 1961 as a writer, lecturer and editor. She was thus an ideal candidate for Palgrave Macmillan to commission for the somewhat under-documented form of puppetry for its series of Readers in Theatre Practice. The series 'aims to gather together both key historical texts and contemporary ways of thinking about the material crafts and practices of the theatre' and, further, wants to 'position the doing in relation to the thinking about doing or the thinking about the materials being used' (xiii).Francis's concise but comprehensive book does all that was asked of it, and more. Its main focus is on puppetry's evolution from the 1990s to the present - mainly from a modern European perspective, but with useful reference to ancient Asian traditions such as the Japanese Bunraku-za and the Indonesian wayang as well as to the Italian commedia dell'arte, forerunner to such enduring puppet characters as Punch and Pulcinello. For Francis's purposes, puppetry 'denotes the act of bringing to imagined life inert figures and forms (representational or abstract) for a ritual or theatrical purpose - for a performance' (5; her emphasis). She adds that it springs from two taproots: 'one nourishes its magic and illusion, its dramaturgy of ritual and religion ... [and] the other nourishes the broad branches of its comedy, parody and satire' (6). Both threads are thoroughly pursued here, along with other hybrid applications in which boundaries are blurred.The book is arranged in seven chapters; the first, titled 'Approach', covers basics like puppetry: the art and the act; puppet theatre and a theatre with puppets; the puppet: animated figure and object; the animated object; and the puppeteer. Chapter Two insightfully examines the related arts of mask, automata - including the brilliant, mechanically operated theatrum mundi of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries - and ventriloquism. The third chapter is devoted to Operational Techniques', covering a broad spectrum of styles from marionettes, glove- and hand-puppets, rods of various kinds, shadows and silhouettes, black light and black theatre, the toy and model theatres and, finally, bunraku. There is even room for brief mention of the extraordinary Vietnamese water-puppets. Here, as elsewhere throughout the book, each sub-section is very well illustrated with vivid descriptions of actual performances as well as by a beautiful selection of aptly chosen monochrome photos.In Chapter Four, titled 'In Performance', the focus shifts to the artists, practitioners and artisans of the puppeteer's professions, beginning with the recent trend for groups of collaborators to devise their shows. Francis then considers the shifting roles of the writer; the director; and the designer and maker (together with lighting and sound designers) - including, crucially, the increasing contemporary need in mixed puppet-and-human shows for puppeteers to be excellent performers, even actors, as well as manipulators. This is followed by a finely nuanced chapter on 'Dramaturgy', as distinct from the more orthodox notion of 'writing'; it is illustrated with a lengthy and telling extract from the Canadian marionettist Ronnie Burkett's Billy Twinkle (2009) and it is probably one the most illuminating chapters in the book. Less so is Chapter Six's reproduction of five articles on aesthetics in puppetry, including Heinrich von Kleist's famous 1810 treatise 'On The Marionette Theatre', Henryk Jurkowski's sobering 'Puppetry Aesthetics at the Start of the Twenty-first Century' (2000) and Roland Barthes' rather confusing 'On Bunraku' of 1971. Given that key ideas like 'aesthetic' and aesthetics' are canvassed so widely elsewhere in the book, I wondered why we needed these. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.065

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.012
Scholarly communication0.0100.013
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0060.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAustralasian drama studiesSame topicTheatre and Performance StudiesFrench-language works237,207