Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Bulla, David W., and Gregory A. Borchard. Journalism in the Civil War Era. New York: Peter Lang, 2010. 256 pp. $89.95. Because the Civil War was the worst event in American history, resulting in more than 600,000 military deaths, one would expect library shelves to be filled with books on how the war was covered by the press. They are not. In fact, there are only a handful of books dealing with the press and the war as a whole, and fewer are considered definitive works. For that reason, any new entry into the field of Civil War journalism history is met with much anticipation. It is indeed good news if a new book makes a significant contribution to the field. Journalism in the Civil War by David W. Bulla and Gregory A. Borchard is just that. It is organized into disparate chapters each dealing with a specific theme. This is not a book to be picked up and read from start to finish; the reader should not expect a seamless progression. Rather, it can be used to find information on specific topics, making it a resource that will be held on to and kept close at hand for many years. All of the chapters are important and interesting to the journalism history researcher, and several make a significant contribution to the field. Much has been written about Horace Greeley, but seldom has his work been brought together in such an enlightening narrative as in chapter three, Bully Pulpit: Horace Greeley's New York Tribune!' The authors delve into his personality and belief system and put into context his relationship with Abraham Lincoln. The authors also shed light on his editorial, Prayer of Twenty Millions, by examining where it came from and what it meant. They demonstrate that his participation in the failed 1 864 peace mediation in Canada, designed by Lincoln to calm Greeley's rhetoric, made him even more convinced that he alone had the solution to the protracted war, which led to even more feuding with the president that is expertly described by the authors. The reader comes away with a deeper understanding of the influential and often conflicted editor. Journalism historians have often pondered whether readership demands or technological change are the primary drivers in shifts in news delivery models. The major technological developments affecting journalism during the Civil War period are dealt with in chapter five, Journalistic Practice and Technological Change. This chapter alone would classify this book as a major contribution to the understanding of Civil War journalism. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,005 | 0,015 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,005 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,005 | 0,008 |
| Communication savante | 0,020 | 0,021 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,005 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,005 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,017 | 0,011 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».