MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1537883349

Günter Grass's Tribute to Uwe Johnson

2004· article· en· W1537883349 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
Kurt J. Fickert

Notice bibliographique

RevueInternational fiction review · 2004
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueLiterature and Cultural Memory
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésGermanTributeFriendshipRealmHistoryPoliticsLiteratureClassicsArt historyArtSociologyPolitical scienceLawSocial scienceArchaeology
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The friendship between Gunter Grass and Uwe Johnson was a significant factor in their lives and, in regard to Grass, in his work. The high esteem Grass accorded his fellow novelist and close friend has been aptly demonstrated by Grass's having listed in Too Far Afield (2000), the translation of his earlier novel Ein weites Feld (1995), the date of Johnson's death as a historic event in the year 1984. It can readily be assumed that Grass prefaced this English version with a list of important political and literary happenings in Germany because he was certain that its readers would have little ready knowledge of them. However, if these readers were acquainted with Grass's previous works, they would at least be prepared for the length and complexity of the text that indeed constitutes ein weites Feld. (1) The close relationship between Grass and Johnson and their families began when they were next-door neighbors living in the no-man's land in Berlin that lay between the German Democratic Republic and West Germany. In the literary realm they soon became the unequal Dioscuri among the writers of a divided Germany. (2) The more acclaimed of the pair, Grass achieved greater recognition because of the gargantuan proportions of the diverse and intellectually stimulating fiction he wrote and published. In turn Grass himself held Johnson in high esteem and considered the somewhat smaller number of his publications to have a literary significance equal to if not even superior to his own. In my view Grass paid particular tribute to his fellow novelist in Too Far Afield, written after Johnson's early death. In addition, I should like to propose that a less obvious allusion to Johnson in Grass's fiction depicts him as a member of the group of authors who sought to reestablish German literature in the seventeenth century, after the Thirty Years War had demolished it. Grass devotes his short novel Das Treffen in Telgte (1979; The Meeting in Telgte, 1981) to this theme. Too Far Afield has the hallmark of all of Grass's major fiction: great length, a text that relates historic events from the viewpoint of a Jonathan Swift-like mind, and a plentitude of characters. Some of these appear in a series of guises; thus the narrator in this story considers himself to be a we, a group of storytellers. Appearing without fictional embellishment as a close friend of this central figure in Too Far Afield is Uwe Johnson, one of postwar Germany's eminent authors. References to and appearances by Johnson in the novel constitute a tribute to him by Grass. The main character in Too Far Afield is Theo Wuttke, whose resemblance to Grass, particularly in regard to his obsession with the written word, constitutes the basic motif in the story. Theo, called Fonty, is preoccupied both with the nineteenth-century German novelist Theodor Fontane and, as a civil servant, with the official documents he is employed to store away in a massive building in East Berlin during the era of a divided Germany. The book's German title, Ein weites Feld, is a line taken from one of Fontane's best-known characters, namely, Old Briest, who, in one of Fontane's finest novels, Effi Briest, has a penchant for saying That's too broad a field for us to go into at the moment, whenever he is pressed for his opinion. Thereby, Grass comments ironically on his own daring in undertaking to write about the difficult time when defeated Germany was a pariah among nations. The dilemma of divided Germany's reunification and simultaneously its redemption or, in the opinion of the East Germans, its ultimate downfall is depicted by the symbol of the elevator in Fonty's cubby-hole-ridden workplace, which goes not only up and down but also from one side to the other. (This feature indicates perhaps the all-encompassing nature of Grass's fiction.) The collapse of this house of archives subsequent to the reunification of Germany expresses the author's chagrin in that regard. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,554
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0050,002

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,029
Tête enseignante GPT0,276
Écart entre enseignants0,247 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2004
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueInternational fiction reviewMême sujetLiterature and Cultural MemoryTravaux en français237 207