MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1537883349

Günter Grass's Tribute to Uwe Johnson

2004· article· en· W1537883349 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Kurt J. Fickert

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational fiction review · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLiterature and Cultural Memory
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGermanTributeFriendshipRealmHistoryPoliticsLiteratureClassicsArt historyArtSociologyPolitical scienceLawSocial scienceArchaeology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The friendship between Gunter Grass and Uwe Johnson was a significant factor in their lives and, in regard to Grass, in his work. The high esteem Grass accorded his fellow novelist and close friend has been aptly demonstrated by Grass's having listed in Too Far Afield (2000), the translation of his earlier novel Ein weites Feld (1995), the date of Johnson's death as a historic event in the year 1984. It can readily be assumed that Grass prefaced this English version with a list of important political and literary happenings in Germany because he was certain that its readers would have little ready knowledge of them. However, if these readers were acquainted with Grass's previous works, they would at least be prepared for the length and complexity of the text that indeed constitutes ein weites Feld. (1) The close relationship between Grass and Johnson and their families began when they were next-door neighbors living in the no-man's land in Berlin that lay between the German Democratic Republic and West Germany. In the literary realm they soon became the unequal Dioscuri among the writers of a divided Germany. (2) The more acclaimed of the pair, Grass achieved greater recognition because of the gargantuan proportions of the diverse and intellectually stimulating fiction he wrote and published. In turn Grass himself held Johnson in high esteem and considered the somewhat smaller number of his publications to have a literary significance equal to if not even superior to his own. In my view Grass paid particular tribute to his fellow novelist in Too Far Afield, written after Johnson's early death. In addition, I should like to propose that a less obvious allusion to Johnson in Grass's fiction depicts him as a member of the group of authors who sought to reestablish German literature in the seventeenth century, after the Thirty Years War had demolished it. Grass devotes his short novel Das Treffen in Telgte (1979; The Meeting in Telgte, 1981) to this theme. Too Far Afield has the hallmark of all of Grass's major fiction: great length, a text that relates historic events from the viewpoint of a Jonathan Swift-like mind, and a plentitude of characters. Some of these appear in a series of guises; thus the narrator in this story considers himself to be a we, a group of storytellers. Appearing without fictional embellishment as a close friend of this central figure in Too Far Afield is Uwe Johnson, one of postwar Germany's eminent authors. References to and appearances by Johnson in the novel constitute a tribute to him by Grass. The main character in Too Far Afield is Theo Wuttke, whose resemblance to Grass, particularly in regard to his obsession with the written word, constitutes the basic motif in the story. Theo, called Fonty, is preoccupied both with the nineteenth-century German novelist Theodor Fontane and, as a civil servant, with the official documents he is employed to store away in a massive building in East Berlin during the era of a divided Germany. The book's German title, Ein weites Feld, is a line taken from one of Fontane's best-known characters, namely, Old Briest, who, in one of Fontane's finest novels, Effi Briest, has a penchant for saying That's too broad a field for us to go into at the moment, whenever he is pressed for his opinion. Thereby, Grass comments ironically on his own daring in undertaking to write about the difficult time when defeated Germany was a pariah among nations. The dilemma of divided Germany's reunification and simultaneously its redemption or, in the opinion of the East Germans, its ultimate downfall is depicted by the symbol of the elevator in Fonty's cubby-hole-ridden workplace, which goes not only up and down but also from one side to the other. (This feature indicates perhaps the all-encompassing nature of Grass's fiction.) The collapse of this house of archives subsequent to the reunification of Germany expresses the author's chagrin in that regard. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.068

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0090.004
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0030.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational fiction reviewSame topicLiterature and Cultural MemoryFrench-language works237,207