MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1548666326

The Influence of the European Union on Turkish Foreign Policy

2012· article· en· W1548666326 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Gavin D. Brockett

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe International Journal of Turkish Studies · 2012
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueTurkey's Politics and Society
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésTurkishEuropean unionForeign policyContext (archaeology)Political scienceTransformative learningPower (physics)PoliticsPolitical economySociologyLawHistoryInternational tradeEconomics
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

OZLEM TERZI, The Influence of the European Union on Turkish Foreign Policy (Ashgate, 2010). Pp. 176. $99.95 cloth.REVIEWED BY GAVIN BROCKETT, Department of Middle East and Islamic History, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, Ontorio, Canada; e-mail: gbrockett@wlu.caThis book explores just how much the European Union has influenced Turkish foreign in the decade since Turkey was granted candidate status in 1999. It serves very well as a carefully documented account of Turkish foreign in this period: in this context author Ozlem Terzi also tries to develop an analytical perspective that recognizes both the transformative power of the EU and its limits on those not within its borders, although it is not clear how novel this contribution really is. The impact of on EU member states has long been the subject of study, but Terzi points out that only recently have scholars begun to examine the impact of Europeanization on candidate countries in Central and Eastern Europe. Her contribution, therefore, is to add to this perspective through an analysis of Turkey's politics and foreign relations throughout its first ten years as a candidate in the seemingly endless process of joining the European Union.Following an introduction to the theoretical literature related to Europeanization, the book is divided into two parts. The first part demonstrates Terzi's concern to move beyond an issue specific focus and instead to provide an actor-based focus. In these chapters she concentrates on the changing perceptions, values and behaviours of the various parties involved in determining Turkey's foreign policy. The analysis in these chapters is perceptive and well thought-out. Terzi dissects the different policies of the major political parties towards the EU and demonstrates not only similarities and differences, but how a particular party's position changed over time. She is sensitive to how the historical and social roots of each party have affected its attitudes towards the EU. At the same time, she argues that a party's stated may not, in fact, be reflected in its actions once it attains power. She attributes this not only to pragmatism resulting from having to actually implement in the context of real developments, but also to the fact that various other actors were able to influence that policy. In particular, Terzi examines the critical role of the military and also the emerging role of civil-society organizations. In the case of the former, she documents the reasonably well known story of how the Justice and Development Party (AKP) has managed to diminish the power of the military and pursue a diplomatic softpolicy in place of the confrontational hard policy that the military promoted in regard to foreign affairs in the 1990s. With reference to civil-society organizations, Terzi explains how Europeanization has led to the growth of these non-governmental actors-both in terms of business and human-rights organizations-and how they have contributed to the formulation of Turkish foreign policy.The second part of the book provides an analysis of different aspects of Turkish foreign since 1999, but especially since the electoral victory of the Justice and Development Party in November 2002. In these chapters Terzi puts into practice her overall theory regarding both the factors that contribute to foreign and the varying degree to which the EU influences it. One chapter concentrates on Turkey's troubled relationship with its neighbors Greece and Armenia. Because Greece is an EU member, its inconsistent and frequently changing policies towards Turkey have inevitably influenced how the EU has approached the various Greek-Turkish problems. Notably, Greece sees Turkish inclusion in the EU accession process as a means by which to encourage Turkey to alter its policies. Just as Turkey's difficulties with Greece have not been resolved, however, neither have the rather different problems between Turkey and Armenia. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,012
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,052

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,003
Communication savante0,0060,003
Science ouverte0,0000,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,034
Tête enseignante GPT0,358
Écart entre enseignants0,324 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2012
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueThe International Journal of Turkish StudiesMême sujetTurkey's Politics and SocietyTravaux en français237 207