Bibliographic record
Abstract
OZLEM TERZI, The Influence of the European Union on Turkish Foreign Policy (Ashgate, 2010). Pp. 176. $99.95 cloth.REVIEWED BY GAVIN BROCKETT, Department of Middle East and Islamic History, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, Ontorio, Canada; e-mail: gbrockett@wlu.caThis book explores just how much the European Union has influenced Turkish foreign in the decade since Turkey was granted candidate status in 1999. It serves very well as a carefully documented account of Turkish foreign in this period: in this context author Ozlem Terzi also tries to develop an analytical perspective that recognizes both the transformative power of the EU and its limits on those not within its borders, although it is not clear how novel this contribution really is. The impact of on EU member states has long been the subject of study, but Terzi points out that only recently have scholars begun to examine the impact of Europeanization on candidate countries in Central and Eastern Europe. Her contribution, therefore, is to add to this perspective through an analysis of Turkey's politics and foreign relations throughout its first ten years as a candidate in the seemingly endless process of joining the European Union.Following an introduction to the theoretical literature related to Europeanization, the book is divided into two parts. The first part demonstrates Terzi's concern to move beyond an issue specific focus and instead to provide an actor-based focus. In these chapters she concentrates on the changing perceptions, values and behaviours of the various parties involved in determining Turkey's foreign policy. The analysis in these chapters is perceptive and well thought-out. Terzi dissects the different policies of the major political parties towards the EU and demonstrates not only similarities and differences, but how a particular party's position changed over time. She is sensitive to how the historical and social roots of each party have affected its attitudes towards the EU. At the same time, she argues that a party's stated may not, in fact, be reflected in its actions once it attains power. She attributes this not only to pragmatism resulting from having to actually implement in the context of real developments, but also to the fact that various other actors were able to influence that policy. In particular, Terzi examines the critical role of the military and also the emerging role of civil-society organizations. In the case of the former, she documents the reasonably well known story of how the Justice and Development Party (AKP) has managed to diminish the power of the military and pursue a diplomatic softpolicy in place of the confrontational hard policy that the military promoted in regard to foreign affairs in the 1990s. With reference to civil-society organizations, Terzi explains how Europeanization has led to the growth of these non-governmental actors-both in terms of business and human-rights organizations-and how they have contributed to the formulation of Turkish foreign policy.The second part of the book provides an analysis of different aspects of Turkish foreign since 1999, but especially since the electoral victory of the Justice and Development Party in November 2002. In these chapters Terzi puts into practice her overall theory regarding both the factors that contribute to foreign and the varying degree to which the EU influences it. One chapter concentrates on Turkey's troubled relationship with its neighbors Greece and Armenia. Because Greece is an EU member, its inconsistent and frequently changing policies towards Turkey have inevitably influenced how the EU has approached the various Greek-Turkish problems. Notably, Greece sees Turkish inclusion in the EU accession process as a means by which to encourage Turkey to alter its policies. Just as Turkey's difficulties with Greece have not been resolved, however, neither have the rather different problems between Turkey and Armenia. …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".