MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1550207819

The Psychopath Test: A Journey through the Madness Industry

2011· article· en· W1550207819 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Aldric Hama

Notice bibliographique

RevueMankind Quarterly · 2011
Typearticle
Langueen
DomainePsychology
ThématiqueParanormal Experiences and Beliefs
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésTheme (computing)Test (biology)PsychoanalysisMental illnessPsychologyPsychopathySociologyMedia studiesPsychiatryMental healthPersonalityComputer science
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The Psychopath Test: A Journey Through the Madness Industry Jon Ronson Riverhead Books, 2011 This book deals with the contentious topic of mental illness, with an emphasis in psychopathy. The book is light on hard science, but journalist Jon Ronson writes an illuminating and highly readable book, covering controversies surrounding the diagnosis and treatment of mental illness. The interviews in the book are very animated; interviewees include incarcerated violent psychopaths who do not believe that they are psychopaths, and Scientologists who eschew psychiatry and side with the psychopaths. One is never certain where Ronson's journey through the madness industry will next lead. A general theme permeating the book is that appearances are deceptive. Ronson opens with a story about a thin but apparently expensively produced book with elliptically written text, copies of which were mailed to a selected number of academics of diverse disciplines. Most of the recipients took it upon themselves to unlock the mysterious text, find out who its author was and the purpose of the book. However, following an investigation that stretched from Sweden to the U.S., Ronson concluded that perhaps the book had been created and distributed for no reason other that for vanity's sake, with the crackpot author merely wanting to observe the ensuing ripple-effect on economic activity, intellectual examination and fanciful speculation, as a stone is cast into still water. Such is the social impact of madness; its effects extend well beyond the patient. An additional, unintended message from this episode has to do with academics being duped into investing a lot of time and effort in something that has neither intrinsic value nor meaning. This is an all-toocommon motivation of much academic research - an overfascination with minutia while disregarding the practical. While psychologists have claimed advancements in the diagnosis and treatment of mental illness, Ronson points out clear failures in both. Noting that Scientologists widely claim that modern psychology has failed in its attempt to treat mental illness, Ronson points to a few victories by Scientologists in outing quacks disguised as psychologists. But then he tells how Scientologists sided with an incarcerated psychopath who claimed that he had feigned mental illness in order to avoid a prison sentence for serious assault, and now claimed that he was being held in an asylum against his will. As one reads further Ronson discusses the conflict between Scientology and established medicine, and uncomfortable facts concerning Scientologists The book takes a similar approach with psychiatric treatment. Ronson describes the experimental treatment program developed by Elliott Barker during the late 1960s and early 1970s at the Oak Ridge Division of the Penetanguishene Mental Health Centre in Ontario, Canada, a maximum security psychiatric facility. The program was a blend of prevailing touchy-feely, self-expression, group therapy run by the inmates themselves, abundant usage of hallucinogenic drugs and coercive rehabilitation techniques used by the Chinese Communist regime (Weisman, 1995). When violent, mentally ill inmates were apparently cured and released, the Oak Ridge program was hailed by the members of the medical community concerned with criminality as impressive and most fruitful. The reality was, however, that the rate of recidivism of those released from the program was 80 percent; well above the average rate of recidivism of 60 percent amongst released patients. The Oak Ridge patients were made worse! Indeed, one psychopathic patient from the program confessed to being better able to manipulate others and better conceal his more outrageous feelings. The thinking at the time was that such NewAge, nonevidence based treatments could be applied to all types of mental illness, including psychopathy. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,006
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,018
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,052

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0060,013
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0020,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0070,009
Communication savante0,0120,013
Science ouverte0,0020,007
Intégrité de la recherche0,0040,013
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0160,005

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,060
Tête enseignante GPT0,328
Écart entre enseignants0,268 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations52
Publié2011
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueMankind QuarterlyMême sujetParanormal Experiences and BeliefsTravaux en français237 207