MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1552745962 · doi:10.1111/j.1751-9020.2010.00309.x

Teaching and Learning Guide for: Hijab and the Abrahamic Traditions

2010· article· en· W1552745962 sur OpenAlex
Farha Bano Ternikar

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueSociology Compass · 2010
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueJewish and Middle Eastern Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSociologySocial scienceEnvironmental ethicsPhilosophy

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Introduction Most research on the veil or hijab focuses on post 911 or post colonial understandings of the veil as a political or religious symbols. The study of hijab from a comparative lens is unique as it demystifies these symbols as well as adds specificity to this misunderstood practice. Veiling practices are contingent in history, race, class and even marital status. This research is important as it adds to the bodies of work in religion, sociology and gender that seek to understand modesty norms or Muslim women. Author recommends Mule, Pat and Diane Barthel. 1992. ‘The Return to the Veil: Individual Autonomy vs. Social Esteem.’ Sociological Forum 7 (2): 323–332. This article examines the practice of veiling among Egyptian women in the 1980s. It emphasizes how Egyptian women turn to the veil as a tool of power in a patriarchal society, rather than view the view as oppressive. The veil enables Egyptian women power in the sense that it allows for respect in a patriarchal society while allowing them more work and educational opportunities in the public sphere. Read, Jen’nan Ghazal and John P. Bartkowski. 2000. ‘To Veil or Not to Veil? A Case Study of Identity Negotiation among Muslim Women Living in Austin, Texas.’ Gender & Society 4: 395–417. This article is important for anyone interested in the sociological study of religion, gender or the body. Read and Bartowski’s study is based on interview data with Arab American women living in Austin, Texas. They spoke with veiled and unveiled women. The article also presents a concise and comprehensive overview of the debate surrounding the veil in the Muslim world. Daly, M. Catherine. 1999. ‘The Paarda Expression of Hejaab among Afghan Women’ in Religion, Dress and the Body , ed. Linda Arthur. New York: New York University Press. This edited volume presents a comparative and multi‐disciplinary approach to the study of the hijab and modesty norms. In particular, it highlights how strands of Christianity, Judaism and Islam use modesty norms as a mechanism of control in their traditions. In particular, this volume includes Catherine Daly’s chapter on the expression of Hijab among Afghan women in non‐Muslim societies. Overall, this volume is significant because it presents an important volume based on qualitative and ethnographic studies that is able to contextualize and explores to links between religion, culture, society and modesty norms. Mernissi. Fatima. 1991. The Veil and the Male Elite. A Feminist Interpretation of Women’s Rights in Islam. Mass.: Addison‐ Wesley. An essential book if one is interested in the historical origins of veiling and Islam in the Middle East. Mernissi’s work was seen as the first acknowledged feminist critique of the hijab. Mernissi’s theories are Bullock 2003, Katherine. Rethinking Muslim Women and the Veil: Challenging Historical and Modern Stereotypes . Herndon, VA: The International Institute of Islamic Thought. Published by an Islamic think tank, this book challenges feminist and western critiques and includes a chapter that challenges Fatima Merinissi’s analysis of the veil. Bullock uses historical, theological, and anthropological methodology to make this argument. She includes interview with 15 Canadian Muslim women. In particular, Bullock explores how the veil is liberating by rather than oppressive specifically in a capitalist culture. Online materials http://www.veiledvoices.com/ This is one of the more comprehensive websites with additional readings and video suggestions on Islam and the veil. http://www.soundvision.com/ Sound Vision is not only an Islamic corporation but also an educational site for Islamic materials, books, and videos. Films and videos Wearing Hijab: Uncovering the Myths of Islam in the United States (34 min) Six women from different ethnic/racial backgrounds in the United States discuss their decision to wear hijab. This video also has a teaching site: http://ffh.films.com/id/6290/Wearing_Hijab_Uncovering_the_Myths_of_Islam_in_the_United_States.htm . Unveiled: Muslim Women Talk about Hijab (36 min) Made by a filmmaker in the Arab world, this documentary discusses feminism, modesty and changes in the Arab world regarding Hijab. This documentary presents the debates in the Arab and Muslim world surrounding hijab. Study guide is also available at http://der.org/films/unveiled.html Hijab: An Act of Faith (30 min) This documentary explores the religious reasons that Muslim women choose to wear the hijab with an emphasis on modesty. It includes interviews with many prominent Muslim women including Dr Ingrid Mattson, the first female president of the Islamic Society of North America. Under One Sky: Arab Women in North America Talk About the Hijab (44 min) This documentary includes both historical overview of the representation of Arab women and interviews with Arab American women in the United States. It explores stereotypes and myths about Arab Women as well as presents a detailed discussion on hijab. Sample syllabus Gender and society (excerpt from my syllabus) Description of course This course examines the processes and institutions through which gender is constructed and operates in society. It analyzes how gender serves to organize everyday life as well as how such institutions as work, education and marriage take their form according to historically variable contexts of gender relations. Gender will be considered in a cross‐cultural context, as well as in interaction with race/ethnicity, religion and class. Students will employ a variety of theoretical perspectives to examine these relationships. This course will also help you develop a sociological understanding of gender, and expand the ability to think critically. Course outline and reading assignments Week 8 (October 19 – 23) Gender, Religion and Feminism ‘It’s Our Church, Too,’ pp. 227 ‘Setting the Problem, Laying the Ground,’ pp. 239 PDF Handouts: ‘Catholic Women Negotiate Feminism: A Research Note’: http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdfpl

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,607
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0030,002
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,026
Tête enseignante GPT0,315
Écart entre enseignants0,290 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle