MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Teaching and Learning Guide for: Hijab and the Abrahamic Traditions

2010· article· en· W1552745962 on OpenAlex
Farha Bano Ternikar

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueSociology Compass · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicJewish and Middle Eastern Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSociologySocial scienceEnvironmental ethicsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction Most research on the veil or hijab focuses on post 911 or post colonial understandings of the veil as a political or religious symbols. The study of hijab from a comparative lens is unique as it demystifies these symbols as well as adds specificity to this misunderstood practice. Veiling practices are contingent in history, race, class and even marital status. This research is important as it adds to the bodies of work in religion, sociology and gender that seek to understand modesty norms or Muslim women. Author recommends Mule, Pat and Diane Barthel. 1992. ‘The Return to the Veil: Individual Autonomy vs. Social Esteem.’ Sociological Forum 7 (2): 323–332. This article examines the practice of veiling among Egyptian women in the 1980s. It emphasizes how Egyptian women turn to the veil as a tool of power in a patriarchal society, rather than view the view as oppressive. The veil enables Egyptian women power in the sense that it allows for respect in a patriarchal society while allowing them more work and educational opportunities in the public sphere. Read, Jen’nan Ghazal and John P. Bartkowski. 2000. ‘To Veil or Not to Veil? A Case Study of Identity Negotiation among Muslim Women Living in Austin, Texas.’ Gender & Society 4: 395–417. This article is important for anyone interested in the sociological study of religion, gender or the body. Read and Bartowski’s study is based on interview data with Arab American women living in Austin, Texas. They spoke with veiled and unveiled women. The article also presents a concise and comprehensive overview of the debate surrounding the veil in the Muslim world. Daly, M. Catherine. 1999. ‘The Paarda Expression of Hejaab among Afghan Women’ in Religion, Dress and the Body , ed. Linda Arthur. New York: New York University Press. This edited volume presents a comparative and multi‐disciplinary approach to the study of the hijab and modesty norms. In particular, it highlights how strands of Christianity, Judaism and Islam use modesty norms as a mechanism of control in their traditions. In particular, this volume includes Catherine Daly’s chapter on the expression of Hijab among Afghan women in non‐Muslim societies. Overall, this volume is significant because it presents an important volume based on qualitative and ethnographic studies that is able to contextualize and explores to links between religion, culture, society and modesty norms. Mernissi. Fatima. 1991. The Veil and the Male Elite. A Feminist Interpretation of Women’s Rights in Islam. Mass.: Addison‐ Wesley. An essential book if one is interested in the historical origins of veiling and Islam in the Middle East. Mernissi’s work was seen as the first acknowledged feminist critique of the hijab. Mernissi’s theories are Bullock 2003, Katherine. Rethinking Muslim Women and the Veil: Challenging Historical and Modern Stereotypes . Herndon, VA: The International Institute of Islamic Thought. Published by an Islamic think tank, this book challenges feminist and western critiques and includes a chapter that challenges Fatima Merinissi’s analysis of the veil. Bullock uses historical, theological, and anthropological methodology to make this argument. She includes interview with 15 Canadian Muslim women. In particular, Bullock explores how the veil is liberating by rather than oppressive specifically in a capitalist culture. Online materials http://www.veiledvoices.com/ This is one of the more comprehensive websites with additional readings and video suggestions on Islam and the veil. http://www.soundvision.com/ Sound Vision is not only an Islamic corporation but also an educational site for Islamic materials, books, and videos. Films and videos Wearing Hijab: Uncovering the Myths of Islam in the United States (34 min) Six women from different ethnic/racial backgrounds in the United States discuss their decision to wear hijab. This video also has a teaching site: http://ffh.films.com/id/6290/Wearing_Hijab_Uncovering_the_Myths_of_Islam_in_the_United_States.htm . Unveiled: Muslim Women Talk about Hijab (36 min) Made by a filmmaker in the Arab world, this documentary discusses feminism, modesty and changes in the Arab world regarding Hijab. This documentary presents the debates in the Arab and Muslim world surrounding hijab. Study guide is also available at http://der.org/films/unveiled.html Hijab: An Act of Faith (30 min) This documentary explores the religious reasons that Muslim women choose to wear the hijab with an emphasis on modesty. It includes interviews with many prominent Muslim women including Dr Ingrid Mattson, the first female president of the Islamic Society of North America. Under One Sky: Arab Women in North America Talk About the Hijab (44 min) This documentary includes both historical overview of the representation of Arab women and interviews with Arab American women in the United States. It explores stereotypes and myths about Arab Women as well as presents a detailed discussion on hijab. Sample syllabus Gender and society (excerpt from my syllabus) Description of course This course examines the processes and institutions through which gender is constructed and operates in society. It analyzes how gender serves to organize everyday life as well as how such institutions as work, education and marriage take their form according to historically variable contexts of gender relations. Gender will be considered in a cross‐cultural context, as well as in interaction with race/ethnicity, religion and class. Students will employ a variety of theoretical perspectives to examine these relationships. This course will also help you develop a sociological understanding of gender, and expand the ability to think critically. Course outline and reading assignments Week 8 (October 19 – 23) Gender, Religion and Feminism ‘It’s Our Church, Too,’ pp. 227 ‘Setting the Problem, Laying the Ground,’ pp. 239 PDF Handouts: ‘Catholic Women Negotiate Feminism: A Research Note’: http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdfpl

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.607
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it