MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1558225020 · doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-5411.2013.02.013

Geriatric cardiology at 62nd Scientific Sessions of American College of Cardiology 2013

2013· article· en· W1558225020 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
William H. Wehrmacher

Notice bibliographique

RevueEurope PMC (PubMed Central) · 2013
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueCardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineSession (web analytics)SpecialtyCardiologyInternal medicinePresentation (obstetrics)Family medicineSurgery

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Geriatric Cardiology found further significant recognition during the 2013, the 62nd, Scientific Session of the American College of Cardiology in San Francisco. More than 19,000 specialists attended from March 9 to March 11. Many came earlier and remained later for tutorial sessions provided by internationally famous cardiologists assembled for the sessions. For example, Valentin Fuster presented a full day symposium on the integration of new advances in cardiovascular disease into daily practice. The session was designed to be an immersion course for the general cardiologist and fellows in training. A special retreat in geriatric cardiology for fellows in training throughout all 3 days of the sessions was provided by a $25,000 grant from the Association of Specialty Professors (ASP) in an attempt to cultivate future investigators and leaders. The six sections: transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), controversies in imaging, advanced heart failure, sweating with the oldies (still active), valid management goals, and clinical dilemmas. Prime time educational events were offered by companies and organizations at various venues throughout San Franscisco. As the leader in the formulation of health policy standards and guidelines, its focus this year was on preventative and therapeutic issues while also covering the entire field of cardiology. For the cardiologist attending, there was a continuing problem of where to attend very hour among the multiple offerings. Of the simultaneous overwhelming excellent presentation, dare I discuss only 3? Since the DIG report in 1996, digitalis which had been the major drug for treatment of heart failure for two centuries has virtually disappeared from use. This “Largely dismissed heart failure drug may help solve costly problem for Medicare and hospitals” as reported in the scientific sessions by Ali Ahmed and at least 14 other famous cardiology collaborators from throughout the world. Searching for ways to reduce Medicare spending, health care reform is targeting Medicare costs resulting from hospital readmission of Medicare beneficiaries for all causes within 30 days if discharge, readmission of Medicare beneficiaries for all causes within 30-days. Annually this costs 17 billion dollars. Heart failure is a leading cause of both hospital admission and readmission for older adults. Digitalis therapy has been neglected for treating heart failure among such adults although it is effective and inexpensive and shows great promise for reducing need for both hospital admission and readmission. Ahmed and coworkers conclude that “Digoxin reduces 30-day all-cause hospital admission in ambulatory older patients with chronic systolic heart failure.” They are in the process of developing future studies needed to examine its effect on 30-day all-cause hospital readmission of hospitalized patients with acute heart failure. “Program for weight loss seems to pay off” as reported in the sessions by Stevan Driver from the Mayo Clinic. Considering the Center for Disease Control and Prevention statement that 2/3 of Americans are overweight or obese and these portend increased morbidity and mortality, this first financial incentive plan for sustained weight control deserves close study and further development. One hundred healthy adults participated for over a year. Weight loss in the incentive groups was 9.08 pounds compared with 2.34 among the others. “Cardiac Rehabilitation Referral and Attendance in Women: A high risk population with two strikes against it” as reported in the sessions by Colbert and coworkers from Canada and New Mexico revealed that “Despite the fact that women derive greater benefit from attending cardiac rehabilitation (CR) than men, they are less likely to be referred and less likely to attend. Greater emphasis needs to be placed on improving referral and attendance at CR thereby positively impacting the quality of care and decreasing mortality in women with coronary artery disease (CAD)”. Their study included 25,958 subjects of whom 6,374 were women. The average age of the women in the study was 67.3 years and of men, was 62.7 years. The college provides professional education and national registries for the measurement and improvement of quality care. Current standards of care, interaction between basic scientists and clinicians, special sessions and seminars for interventionalists, along with successful plenary presentations, were all thoroughly represented, although so generously covered as to make selection among them by the attendees somewhat overwhelming. It brought cardiologists and cardiovascular specialists from around the world together to share the newest discoveries in treatment and prevention. The American College of Cardiology gathers evidence throughout the world from the cardiovascular progress reported during its annual meeting.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,004
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,123
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,412

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0040,008
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0040,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0030,001
Communication savante0,0050,002
Science ouverte0,0010,005
Intégrité de la recherche0,0040,006
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,1230,070

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,014
Tête enseignante GPT0,231
Écart entre enseignants0,217 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2013
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueEurope PMC (PubMed Central)→Même sujetCardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes→Travaux en français237 207→