MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Geriatric cardiology at 62nd Scientific Sessions of American College of Cardiology 2013

2013· article· en· W1558225020 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
William H. Wehrmacher

Bibliographic record

VenueEurope PMC (PubMed Central) · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSession (web analytics)SpecialtyCardiologyInternal medicinePresentation (obstetrics)Family medicineSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Geriatric Cardiology found further significant recognition during the 2013, the 62nd, Scientific Session of the American College of Cardiology in San Francisco. More than 19,000 specialists attended from March 9 to March 11. Many came earlier and remained later for tutorial sessions provided by internationally famous cardiologists assembled for the sessions. For example, Valentin Fuster presented a full day symposium on the integration of new advances in cardiovascular disease into daily practice. The session was designed to be an immersion course for the general cardiologist and fellows in training. A special retreat in geriatric cardiology for fellows in training throughout all 3 days of the sessions was provided by a $25,000 grant from the Association of Specialty Professors (ASP) in an attempt to cultivate future investigators and leaders. The six sections: transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), controversies in imaging, advanced heart failure, sweating with the oldies (still active), valid management goals, and clinical dilemmas. Prime time educational events were offered by companies and organizations at various venues throughout San Franscisco. As the leader in the formulation of health policy standards and guidelines, its focus this year was on preventative and therapeutic issues while also covering the entire field of cardiology. For the cardiologist attending, there was a continuing problem of where to attend very hour among the multiple offerings. Of the simultaneous overwhelming excellent presentation, dare I discuss only 3? Since the DIG report in 1996, digitalis which had been the major drug for treatment of heart failure for two centuries has virtually disappeared from use. This “Largely dismissed heart failure drug may help solve costly problem for Medicare and hospitals” as reported in the scientific sessions by Ali Ahmed and at least 14 other famous cardiology collaborators from throughout the world. Searching for ways to reduce Medicare spending, health care reform is targeting Medicare costs resulting from hospital readmission of Medicare beneficiaries for all causes within 30 days if discharge, readmission of Medicare beneficiaries for all causes within 30-days. Annually this costs 17 billion dollars. Heart failure is a leading cause of both hospital admission and readmission for older adults. Digitalis therapy has been neglected for treating heart failure among such adults although it is effective and inexpensive and shows great promise for reducing need for both hospital admission and readmission. Ahmed and coworkers conclude that “Digoxin reduces 30-day all-cause hospital admission in ambulatory older patients with chronic systolic heart failure.” They are in the process of developing future studies needed to examine its effect on 30-day all-cause hospital readmission of hospitalized patients with acute heart failure. “Program for weight loss seems to pay off” as reported in the sessions by Stevan Driver from the Mayo Clinic. Considering the Center for Disease Control and Prevention statement that 2/3 of Americans are overweight or obese and these portend increased morbidity and mortality, this first financial incentive plan for sustained weight control deserves close study and further development. One hundred healthy adults participated for over a year. Weight loss in the incentive groups was 9.08 pounds compared with 2.34 among the others. “Cardiac Rehabilitation Referral and Attendance in Women: A high risk population with two strikes against it” as reported in the sessions by Colbert and coworkers from Canada and New Mexico revealed that “Despite the fact that women derive greater benefit from attending cardiac rehabilitation (CR) than men, they are less likely to be referred and less likely to attend. Greater emphasis needs to be placed on improving referral and attendance at CR thereby positively impacting the quality of care and decreasing mortality in women with coronary artery disease (CAD)”. Their study included 25,958 subjects of whom 6,374 were women. The average age of the women in the study was 67.3 years and of men, was 62.7 years. The college provides professional education and national registries for the measurement and improvement of quality care. Current standards of care, interaction between basic scientists and clinicians, special sessions and seminars for interventionalists, along with successful plenary presentations, were all thoroughly represented, although so generously covered as to make selection among them by the attendees somewhat overwhelming. It brought cardiologists and cardiovascular specialists from around the world together to share the newest discoveries in treatment and prevention. The American College of Cardiology gathers evidence throughout the world from the cardiovascular progress reported during its annual meeting.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.123
Threshold uncertainty score0.412

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0040.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1230.070

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEurope PMC (PubMed Central)→Same topicCardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes→French-language works237,207→