33 DEVELOPMENT OF BOVINE EMBRYOS CLONED WITH FETAL FIBROBLASTS ARRESTED AT G0/G1 PHASE BY DIFFERENT TREATMENTS
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Numerous factors have an effect on the development of cloned embryos, and one of the most important might be the synchronization between donor nuclei and recipient ooplasts. The objective of this study was to examine the effect of donor cell treatments for G0/G1 synchronization and the donor cell type on development and incidence of apoptosis in cloned cattle embryos. Primary cultures were established from a female fetus on Day 50 of gestation and adult ear skin biopsies. The cells were used for assessements of cell cycle and apoptosis, and for nuclear transfer. Cells were randomly allocated into 3 experimental treatment groups after 6–8 passages: Group 1 (confluent), cells were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS until 90% confluent; Group 2 (serum-starvation), cells were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 0.5% FBS for 5 days; Group 3 (Roscovitine), cells were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS and 30 µM Roscovitine for 12 h. Cell cycle and apoptosis were analyzed using flow cytometry after labelling with DAPI and YO-PRO-1, respectively. At 19 h post-maturation (hpm), enucleated oocytes were reconstructed with donor cells and fused by a single DC pulse (1.6 kV/cm, 60 µs) delivered by a BTX 200. After activation with the combination of ionomycin (5 µM, 5 min) and cycloheximide (10 µg mL-1, 5 h), the eggs were cultured in CR1aa medium for 3 days and additionally cultured in CR1aa medium supplemented with 30 mg mL-1 BSA for 5 days at 39°C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 in air. Differences between groups were analyzed using one-way ANOVA after arc-sine transformation of the proportional data. There were no significantly differences in the incidence of cells arrested at G0/G1 for fetal fibroblasts cultured in the three treatment groups (87%, 83% and 80%; confluent, serum starvation and Roscovitine, respectively). More cells were apoptotic in Group 2 compared to the cells in Groups 1 and 3 (12% v. 6 and 6%, respectively) (P < 0.05). Blastocyst development of cloned embryos was significantly (P < 0.05) higher when fetal fibroblasts from Group 1 were used, compared to Groups 2 and 3 (35.1%, v. 31 and 29.7%, respectively). Similar results were observed in the use of ear skin fibroblasts as nuclear transfer donor cells (32.7%, v. 24 and 24%, respectively). These results suggest that fetal fibroblasts can be effectively synchronized at G0/G1 by three different treatments, including growth to confluence, serum-starvation and Roscovitine treatment. However, based on blastocyst development and levels of apoptosis, the use of confluent fetal fibroblasts as donor cells is more effective than using cells synchronized by serum-starvation or Roscovitine treatment in the production of cloned bovine embryos. [Supported by High Technology Development Project for Agriculture and Forestry Korea, MAF-SGRP, 30012-05-3-SB010 and Cho-A Pharm. Co. LTD.]
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».