33 DEVELOPMENT OF BOVINE EMBRYOS CLONED WITH FETAL FIBROBLASTS ARRESTED AT G0/G1 PHASE BY DIFFERENT TREATMENTS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Numerous factors have an effect on the development of cloned embryos, and one of the most important might be the synchronization between donor nuclei and recipient ooplasts. The objective of this study was to examine the effect of donor cell treatments for G0/G1 synchronization and the donor cell type on development and incidence of apoptosis in cloned cattle embryos. Primary cultures were established from a female fetus on Day 50 of gestation and adult ear skin biopsies. The cells were used for assessements of cell cycle and apoptosis, and for nuclear transfer. Cells were randomly allocated into 3 experimental treatment groups after 6–8 passages: Group 1 (confluent), cells were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS until 90% confluent; Group 2 (serum-starvation), cells were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 0.5% FBS for 5 days; Group 3 (Roscovitine), cells were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS and 30 µM Roscovitine for 12 h. Cell cycle and apoptosis were analyzed using flow cytometry after labelling with DAPI and YO-PRO-1, respectively. At 19 h post-maturation (hpm), enucleated oocytes were reconstructed with donor cells and fused by a single DC pulse (1.6 kV/cm, 60 µs) delivered by a BTX 200. After activation with the combination of ionomycin (5 µM, 5 min) and cycloheximide (10 µg mL-1, 5 h), the eggs were cultured in CR1aa medium for 3 days and additionally cultured in CR1aa medium supplemented with 30 mg mL-1 BSA for 5 days at 39°C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 in air. Differences between groups were analyzed using one-way ANOVA after arc-sine transformation of the proportional data. There were no significantly differences in the incidence of cells arrested at G0/G1 for fetal fibroblasts cultured in the three treatment groups (87%, 83% and 80%; confluent, serum starvation and Roscovitine, respectively). More cells were apoptotic in Group 2 compared to the cells in Groups 1 and 3 (12% v. 6 and 6%, respectively) (P < 0.05). Blastocyst development of cloned embryos was significantly (P < 0.05) higher when fetal fibroblasts from Group 1 were used, compared to Groups 2 and 3 (35.1%, v. 31 and 29.7%, respectively). Similar results were observed in the use of ear skin fibroblasts as nuclear transfer donor cells (32.7%, v. 24 and 24%, respectively). These results suggest that fetal fibroblasts can be effectively synchronized at G0/G1 by three different treatments, including growth to confluence, serum-starvation and Roscovitine treatment. However, based on blastocyst development and levels of apoptosis, the use of confluent fetal fibroblasts as donor cells is more effective than using cells synchronized by serum-starvation or Roscovitine treatment in the production of cloned bovine embryos. [Supported by High Technology Development Project for Agriculture and Forestry Korea, MAF-SGRP, 30012-05-3-SB010 and Cho-A Pharm. Co. LTD.]
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".