MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1560134824 · doi:10.1071/rdv16n1ab43

43 IMPROVED IN VITRO DEVELOPMENT OF PORCINE NUCLEAR TRANSFER EMBRYOS WITH 6-DMAP FOLLOWING FUSION

2004· article· en· W1560134824 sur OpenAlexafffund
Gi-Sun Im, L. Lai, Z. Liu, Yanhong Hao, Ciara M. Murphy, Randall S. Prather

Notice bibliographique

RevueReproduction Fertility and Development · 2004
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
ThématiqueAnimal Genetics and Reproduction
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Guelph
Organismes subventionnairesInternational Council for Canadian StudiesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaTürkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma KurumuOntario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs
Mots-clésBlastocystEmbryoAndrologyEmbryogenesisEmbryo cultureIn vitroBiologyChemistryMolecular biologyCell biologyBiochemistryMedicine

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Although nuclear transfer (NT) has successfully produced cloned piglets, the development to blastocyst and to term is still low. Activation of the NT embryos is one of the key factors to improve the developmental ability of porcine NT embryos. Electric pulses as well as chemicals have been used to activate porcine NT embryos. This study was conducted to investigate the effect of continued activation following fusion pulses on in vitro development of porcine NT Embryos. Oocytes derived from a local abattoir were matured for 42 to 44 h and enucleated. Ear skin cells were obtained from a 4-day-old transgenic pig transduced with eGFP recombinant retrovirus. Enucleated oocytes were reconstructed and cultured in PZM-3 in a gas atmosphere of 5% CO2 in air. Cleavage and blastocyst developmental rates were assessed under a stereomicroscope on Day 3 or 6. Blastocysts were stained with 5 µg of Hoechst 33342 and total cell number was determined with an epifluorescent microscope. In Experiment 1, oocytes were activated with two 1.2 kV/cm for 30 µs (E) in 0.3 M mannitol supplemented with either 0.1 or 1.0 mM Ca2+. In each treatment, activated oocytes were divided into three groups. The first group was control (E). Other two groups were exposed to either ionomycin and 6-DMAP (E + I + D) or 6-DMAP (E + D) immediately after the electric pulses. In Experiment 2, fusion was conducted by using 1.0 mM Ca2+ in the fusion medium. Fused NT embryos were divided into three treatments. NT embryos were fused and activated simultaneously with electric pulse as a control (C); the second group was treated with 6-DMAP immediately after fusion treatment (D0); and the third group was treated with 6-DMAP at 20 min (D20) after fusion. In experiment 1, for 0.1 mM Ca2+, developmental rates to the blastocyst stage for E, E + I + D or E + D were 12.5, 26.7 and 22.5%, respectively. For 1.0 mM Ca2+, developmental rates to the blastocyst stage were 11.4, 28.3 and 35.6%, respectively. The activated oocytes treated with 6-DMAP following the electric pulses by using 1.0 mM Ca2+ in fusion medium had higher (P < 0.05) developmental rates to the blastocyst stage. In Experiment 2, developmental rates to the blastocyst stage for C, D0 or D20 were 10.0, 12.3, and 19.9%, respectively. Developmental rate to the blastocyst stage was higher (P < 0.05) in D20. Fragmentation rates were 19.9, 10.8, and 9.0%, respectively. Regardless of Ca2+ concentration in fusion medium, continued treatments with chemicals following electric pulses supported more development of porcine activated oocytes. Treating NT embryos with 6-DMAP alone after fusion was completed by using 1.0 mM Ca2+ in fusion medium improved the developmental rates to the blastocyst stage and prevented fragmentation accompanied by electric fusion. This study was supported by NIH NCRR 13438 and Food for the 21st Century.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,125
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,583

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,010
Tête enseignante GPT0,215
Écart entre enseignants0,205 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2004
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueReproduction Fertility and DevelopmentMême sujetAnimal Genetics and ReproductionTravaux en français237 207