MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1560134824 · doi:10.1071/rdv16n1ab43

43 IMPROVED IN VITRO DEVELOPMENT OF PORCINE NUCLEAR TRANSFER EMBRYOS WITH 6-DMAP FOLLOWING FUSION

2004· article· en· W1560134824 on OpenAlexafffund
Gi-Sun Im, L. Lai, Z. Liu, Yanhong Hao, Ciara M. Murphy, Randall S. Prather

Bibliographic record

VenueReproduction Fertility and Development · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAnimal Genetics and Reproduction
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersInternational Council for Canadian StudiesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaTürkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma KurumuOntario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs
KeywordsBlastocystEmbryoAndrologyEmbryogenesisEmbryo cultureIn vitroBiologyChemistryMolecular biologyCell biologyBiochemistryMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Although nuclear transfer (NT) has successfully produced cloned piglets, the development to blastocyst and to term is still low. Activation of the NT embryos is one of the key factors to improve the developmental ability of porcine NT embryos. Electric pulses as well as chemicals have been used to activate porcine NT embryos. This study was conducted to investigate the effect of continued activation following fusion pulses on in vitro development of porcine NT Embryos. Oocytes derived from a local abattoir were matured for 42 to 44 h and enucleated. Ear skin cells were obtained from a 4-day-old transgenic pig transduced with eGFP recombinant retrovirus. Enucleated oocytes were reconstructed and cultured in PZM-3 in a gas atmosphere of 5% CO2 in air. Cleavage and blastocyst developmental rates were assessed under a stereomicroscope on Day 3 or 6. Blastocysts were stained with 5 µg of Hoechst 33342 and total cell number was determined with an epifluorescent microscope. In Experiment 1, oocytes were activated with two 1.2 kV/cm for 30 µs (E) in 0.3 M mannitol supplemented with either 0.1 or 1.0 mM Ca2+. In each treatment, activated oocytes were divided into three groups. The first group was control (E). Other two groups were exposed to either ionomycin and 6-DMAP (E + I + D) or 6-DMAP (E + D) immediately after the electric pulses. In Experiment 2, fusion was conducted by using 1.0 mM Ca2+ in the fusion medium. Fused NT embryos were divided into three treatments. NT embryos were fused and activated simultaneously with electric pulse as a control (C); the second group was treated with 6-DMAP immediately after fusion treatment (D0); and the third group was treated with 6-DMAP at 20 min (D20) after fusion. In experiment 1, for 0.1 mM Ca2+, developmental rates to the blastocyst stage for E, E + I + D or E + D were 12.5, 26.7 and 22.5%, respectively. For 1.0 mM Ca2+, developmental rates to the blastocyst stage were 11.4, 28.3 and 35.6%, respectively. The activated oocytes treated with 6-DMAP following the electric pulses by using 1.0 mM Ca2+ in fusion medium had higher (P < 0.05) developmental rates to the blastocyst stage. In Experiment 2, developmental rates to the blastocyst stage for C, D0 or D20 were 10.0, 12.3, and 19.9%, respectively. Developmental rate to the blastocyst stage was higher (P < 0.05) in D20. Fragmentation rates were 19.9, 10.8, and 9.0%, respectively. Regardless of Ca2+ concentration in fusion medium, continued treatments with chemicals following electric pulses supported more development of porcine activated oocytes. Treating NT embryos with 6-DMAP alone after fusion was completed by using 1.0 mM Ca2+ in fusion medium improved the developmental rates to the blastocyst stage and prevented fragmentation accompanied by electric fusion. This study was supported by NIH NCRR 13438 and Food for the 21st Century.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.125
Threshold uncertainty score0.583

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReproduction Fertility and DevelopmentSame topicAnimal Genetics and ReproductionFrench-language works237,207