MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1563483427

Adolescent development in the context of Canadian-Chinese immigrant families

2001· article· en· W1563483427 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ching Man Lam

Notice bibliographique

RevueScholars Commons (Wilfrid Laurier University) · 2001
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueParental Involvement in Education
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésImmigrationContext (archaeology)Political scienceSociologyGender studiesHistory
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

This study investigates the developmental processes and outcomes of Canadian-Chinese adolescents in families who had immigrated from Hong Kong to the Toronto, Canada area between seven and fifteen years previously. In-depth qualitative interviews with nineteen adolescents, between the ages of sixteen and twenty-one, and ten parents were conducted between February and August 1997. The study's results describe the dynamic interplay of culture and migration that shapes the developmental processes and outcomes of adolescence in Canadian-Chinese Hong Kong immigrant families. The results also address the meanings constructed by the parents and the adolescents as a result of their experiences. Studies show that the current wave of Hong Kong immigrants are middle-class professionals who migrated to Canada to achieve democratic, social, and economic security, in response to the perceived political threat resulting from the imminent return of Hong Kong to China in 1997. In their accounts of their reasons for migration, the parent respondents revealed that they were motivated by the desire to provide their children with a foreign passport and better education opportunities. Migration, therefore, has been connoted as the parents' sacrifice for a better future for their children. As a result, adolescents have a strong sense of indebtedness and try their best to repay this debt. The concept of bao, (reciprocity) thus serves as the basis for parent-adolescent relationship and as a guide for their interaction. A "not grown up forever" theme emerged from the participants' construction of adolescent development. It reflects the traditional Chinese construction of adolescence as a continuation of childhood in which parents still guide, teach, coach, and monitor their children, and adolescents still accept and respect their parents' wishes, and remain "not grown up" and dependent. The informants' reliance on this construction reflects the influence of the Chinese perception of human development and the hierarchical parent-child relationship in Chinese immigrant families. The findings also indicate that Chinese parents and adolescents co-construct the dominant theme of "covert parental control" in the adolescent development process. "Covert control," in this context, refers to a form of parenting characterized by parental guidance, family teaching, coaching, and monitoring. Parents, through "tact" and "skills," successfully influence and guide their children. Children, motivated by their sense of indebtedness and the benefit they gain from being a dependent, reinforce their parents' covert control and the indigenous concept of guar: in Chinese parenting practice. The ideal outcome of adolescent development, as reflected in the narratives of the informants, is a "self in relational networks." The migration experience of being "uprooted" and the traditional Chinese perception of the self, which is a self that is organized and developed in the context of relationships (guanxi), contribute to the "self in relational network" construction. According to Canadian-Chinese immigrant parents and adolescents, the expected developmental outcome of adolescence is a "self" that is appropriately positioned in the relational networks. The findings of this study reveal a Chinese conception of adolescent development in the context of culture and migration.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,678
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,577

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,033
Tête enseignante GPT0,263
Écart entre enseignants0,231 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations8
Publié2001
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueScholars Commons (Wilfrid Laurier University)Même sujetParental Involvement in EducationTravaux en français237 207