MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1563483427

Adolescent development in the context of Canadian-Chinese immigrant families

2001· article· en· W1563483427 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ching Man Lam

Bibliographic record

VenueScholars Commons (Wilfrid Laurier University) · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicParental Involvement in Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImmigrationContext (archaeology)Political scienceSociologyGender studiesHistory
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study investigates the developmental processes and outcomes of Canadian-Chinese adolescents in families who had immigrated from Hong Kong to the Toronto, Canada area between seven and fifteen years previously. In-depth qualitative interviews with nineteen adolescents, between the ages of sixteen and twenty-one, and ten parents were conducted between February and August 1997. The study's results describe the dynamic interplay of culture and migration that shapes the developmental processes and outcomes of adolescence in Canadian-Chinese Hong Kong immigrant families. The results also address the meanings constructed by the parents and the adolescents as a result of their experiences. Studies show that the current wave of Hong Kong immigrants are middle-class professionals who migrated to Canada to achieve democratic, social, and economic security, in response to the perceived political threat resulting from the imminent return of Hong Kong to China in 1997. In their accounts of their reasons for migration, the parent respondents revealed that they were motivated by the desire to provide their children with a foreign passport and better education opportunities. Migration, therefore, has been connoted as the parents' sacrifice for a better future for their children. As a result, adolescents have a strong sense of indebtedness and try their best to repay this debt. The concept of bao, (reciprocity) thus serves as the basis for parent-adolescent relationship and as a guide for their interaction. A "not grown up forever" theme emerged from the participants' construction of adolescent development. It reflects the traditional Chinese construction of adolescence as a continuation of childhood in which parents still guide, teach, coach, and monitor their children, and adolescents still accept and respect their parents' wishes, and remain "not grown up" and dependent. The informants' reliance on this construction reflects the influence of the Chinese perception of human development and the hierarchical parent-child relationship in Chinese immigrant families. The findings also indicate that Chinese parents and adolescents co-construct the dominant theme of "covert parental control" in the adolescent development process. "Covert control," in this context, refers to a form of parenting characterized by parental guidance, family teaching, coaching, and monitoring. Parents, through "tact" and "skills," successfully influence and guide their children. Children, motivated by their sense of indebtedness and the benefit they gain from being a dependent, reinforce their parents' covert control and the indigenous concept of guar: in Chinese parenting practice. The ideal outcome of adolescent development, as reflected in the narratives of the informants, is a "self in relational networks." The migration experience of being "uprooted" and the traditional Chinese perception of the self, which is a self that is organized and developed in the context of relationships (guanxi), contribute to the "self in relational network" construction. According to Canadian-Chinese immigrant parents and adolescents, the expected developmental outcome of adolescence is a "self" that is appropriately positioned in the relational networks. The findings of this study reveal a Chinese conception of adolescent development in the context of culture and migration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.678
Threshold uncertainty score0.577

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScholars Commons (Wilfrid Laurier University)Same topicParental Involvement in EducationFrench-language works237,207