Raynaud's phenomenon secondary to rheumatoid arthritis may be predictive of more erosive disease
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Using a standardized assessment, data were collected on a cross-sectional cohort of RA subjects ( n = 329; mean age 60.3 ± 0.7 years; 77% female; 76% erosions, 75% positive rheumatoid factor [RF]) who met the American College of Rheumatology criteria for RA and had been seen at a London, Ontario rheumatology clinical practice during the 6-month study period. Study participants were prevalent (follow-up) cases and new referrals. A subsequent chart review was performed to verify clinic data and also to collect data on all variables that were not available at the time of the clinic visit. RP was defined as pallor of the fingers along with rubor, cyanosis, or both. The mean disease duration was 12 ± 0.6 years. Seventy patients (22%) had RP. RP status was not related to gender, age, or disease duration. The mean age at onset of RP was 50.7 ± 2 years and the mean RP duration was 9.2 ± 1.5 years. Patients presented with RP a mean of 3.8 ± 1.4 years after the diagnosis of RA (95% confidence interval, 0.9–6.6 years; minimum, maximum = 31 years before RA diagnosis, 32 years after). RP status was not associated with the presence of nodules and erosions. Patients with sclerodactyly [all was distal to proximal interphalangeal joints] were more likely than those without to have RP (34% versus 17%, P < 0.001). Subjects with sclerodactyly (26%) were also more likely than those without to have erosions (86% versus 72%, P < 0.02). Patients who developed RP after their RA diagnosis were more likely to have erosions than those who developed RP before RA ( P < 0.005). As expected, positive RF was associated with longer disease duration ( P < 0.04). Higher RF values were associated with longer disease duration ( P < 0.005) and increased RP duration ( P < 0.01). RP was present in 22% of the RA patients seen in a rheumatology clinical practice in London, Ontario during the 6-month study period. RP appears to develop relatively soon (approximately 1–7 years) after RA diagnosis in the majority of cases. Idiopathic RP may be different from RP secondary to RA, the latter of which may be associated with more erosive RA. Sclerodactyly is associated with erosive arthritis and RP in RA. Higher RF values were indicative of increased RA and RP duration.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle