Musculoskeletal images. Femoral fracture in adult osteogenesis imperfecta.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
A 42-year-old woman with osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) fell and had immediate pain in her right thigh. Before this, she was occasionally ambulatory, using 2 canes to walk short distances. She had had multiple fractures as a child, undergoing intramedullary nailing of both her femurs and tibias, but as an adult had sustained only a single fracture 17 years previously, requiring fixation of a right femoral neck fracture with a Richards hip screw (Smith & Nephew Richards). She was of short stature and had extreme varus bowing of both lower extremities. She was in severe pain and could not move her right lower extremity. The injured limb was slightly larger than the contralateral limb; however, both had a significant amount of adipose tissue. Further examination revealed multiple surgical scars along the length of the femur. Motor and sensory examinations of her right foot and ankle were normal, and there were strong symmetrical pulses. Radiographs revealed a transverse fracture distal to the previous hip screw implant (Fig. 1). The femur had a severe varus bow. The bone was osteopenic and the cortices were extremely thin. FIG. 1. Admission anteroposterior (left) and lateral (right) radiographs of the femur in a 46-year-old woman with osteogenesis imperfecta. Internal fixation devices for proximal femoral fractures are in place. Figure 1. Continued With modern medical and surgical treatment of children with OI, we now commonly see fractures in adults with OI. These are often the result of minor trauma. The disease process in the patient presented here posed several difficulties for treatment. The patient was too heavy and the femoral canal was too large for most of the traditional flexible nailing and wiring techniques used in pediatrics, and too narrow and fragile for nails used in adult femoral fractures. In this patient, the severe bowing of her leg, the fragility of her bone as well as the small diameter and length of the femoral canal were important. It was impossible to use a traditional femoral intramedullary nail, so a flexible humeral nail was used for internal fixation of her femur (Flexnail; Synthes, Canada*). This nail is composed of intercalated segments that allow 5° of motion at each link. After insertion of the nail into the intramedullary canal of a long bone, an internal cable system within the nail is tightened. This action compresses the segments and diminishes the motion at each segment, thus increasing the rigidity of the nail. This nail is intended for use in acute and pathologic fractures of the humerus. It can be inserted in antegrade and retrograde fashion. It comes in 2 diameters, 7.5 and 9.0 mm, and standard lengths 180–300 mm. The nail has a potential 30ο bend to facilitate off-axis insertion. Because of its small diameter and flexibility during insertion, the nail theoretically can be inserted into a varus bowed femur having a small diameter canal without breaching the opposite cortex. The diaphyseal screws of the patient's hip implant were removed through a previous lateral incision. Next, a distal anteromedial approach to the femur was chosen for the entry point of the nail allowing a 30ο angulation of the nail to the long axis of the femur. An awl was used to open the canal medially. The bone was very fragile, as in most OI patients, receiving medical therapy with bisphosphonates. The canal was reamed by hand using 6- and 8-mm reamers (Synream; Synthes Canada). A guide wire was placed in the canal until it reached the previous hip screw. The canal was reamed further using the 8.5-mm reamer. At all times fluoroscopy was used to ensure the canal was not breached. A 7.5-mm х 210-mm flexible humeral nail was inserted (Fig. 2) from an anteromedial insertion point in the distal femur. The tensioning bolt was inserted to stiffen the nail. Stiffening the nail also functioned to realign the fracture fragments. After this, a distal transverse locking bolt was inserted. The small peripheral wires of the nail were advanced in a bouquet fashion for proximal fixation. Radiologically and clinically, the fracture was stable both rotationally and axially. Postoperative radiographs revealed a well-aligned femur (Fig. 3). FIG. 2. Insertion of the flexible humeral nail through an anteromedial incision in distal femur. IH = insertion handle with locking bolt insertion screwdriver in place. FIG. 3. Postoperative radiographs showing the flexible humeral nail in the femur. Tightening of the nail locking mechanism partially corrected the varus deformity.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,051 | 0,006 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».